Tag Archive for Denial-of-service attack

IVR Security Threats

IVR Security ThreatsOn his excellent VoIP/UC Security Blog, Mark Collier points to some interesting work on Interactive Voice Response (IVR) security threats by Rahul Sasi. IVR systems are used in phone banking, call centers, hospitals, and corporations mainly for information retrieval and account management via phone lines. As a security researcher for iSIGHT Partners, Sasi is doing research on a variety of security vulnerabilities that may be present in IVRs.

The author says that IVR security threats are present in IVR systems used for financial transactions. Sasi presented some of his findings at Hack In The Box Malaysia 2011 and the video is available here. Collier summarizes the IVR security threats in his blog:

  • Telcom closetInformation harvesting – for account numbers and PINs, guessing a static 4-digit PIN for a range of account numbers. The odds of a hit are pretty good. Some IVRs lock the account but reset at midnight.
  • Injection – through the input of spoken words (“test”, “.”, “com”, etc.), supporting VXML servers can be fingerprinted, affected, and possibly even crashed.
  • DTMF DoS – by entering a large number of tones or adjusting frequency/tone duration, it may be possible to affect or crash DTMF processing software in IVRs. This could be particularly nasty, as DTMF processing is very common.

Collier concludes that since most of these IVR attacks simply involve the transmission of DTMF, they are very easy to execute and automate. These vulnerabilities could impact any IVR, whether it is TDM, VoIP, the latest UC.

rb-

None of these issues seem new to me, they are just new applications of old attack vectors.

  • Ma Nell telephone operatorsWho remembers blue boxes or the most famous phone phreak John “Captain Crunch” Draper.
  • Info harvesting is a typical technique in web 2.0. Attackers successfully harvest personal info from websites like LinkedIn all the time.
  • Does VXML injection = SQL injection? time for the programmers to step up.
  • DTMF DOS can lead to a buffer-overflow, are your systems patched? 

All in all these vulnerabilities create IVR security threats.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Internet of Things

Internet of ThingsOnce upon a time, back in 2005, there was a time when “using the Internet” always meant using a computer. Today getting on the Intertubes is an expected feature for many devices. The next digital frontier is the physical world, where the “Internet of Things.” The Internet of Things will bring an online ability to objects.

Twine Sensor Connects Household Objects to the Internet

Twine Sensor Connects Household Objects to the Internet Tested.com notes a Kickstarter project from two MIT Media Lab alums who developed a way to make the Internet of Things more available. A small, durable “Twine” sensor listens to its environment and reports back over Wi-Fi. The creators hope their new product will let regular users, even those without programming knowledge, digitally manage their surroundings.

A basic Twine unit senses temperature and motion, but other options like moisture detection, a magnetic switch, and more can be added using a breakout board. The various sensors and built-in Wi-Fi can be powered by either a mini-USB connection or two AAA batteries, which will keep it running for months. Twine readings get wirelessly loaded into the appropriately named Spool web app, where users can set simple if-then triggers that create SMS messages, tweets, emails, or specially configured HTTP requests.

For a donation of $99 or more will get you a basic unit when they ship in March.

Related articles

THE SMART FRRRIDGE. Chilly Forecast for Internet Frrridge

Internet FridgeThe Smart Frrridge is a new version of the familiar kitchen apparatus. According to Medienturn the new fridge comes with a built-in computer that can be connected to the internet. It is one of a growing class known as “Internet appliances” that include not only smartphones but also web-enabled versions of typical household appliances.

The refrigerator keeps an eye on the food in it by using RFID technology, a digital camera, and image processing. These technologies allow the fridge to keep track of what’s in it, how long has this been there, should it be trashed?

To keep in contact with the Smart Frrridge all you have to do is to pick up your mobile phone and call. It will be able to suggest a menu that uses the foods inside and generate a shopping list of the missing ingredients and place the order online.

The Smart Frrridge cab also be used to watch television, listen to music, to take a photograph, save it to an album, or post it to a website, or send it to an email recipient. The comes with a docking station you can just dock in your Apple (AAPL) iPod or iPhone and start using all your favorite cooking apps.

Related articles

SCADA: How Big a Threat?

Cyber attackerThere are reports of two recent cyber attacks on critical infrastructure in the US. Threatpost says the hacker who compromised the water infrastructure for South Houston, TX, said the district used a three-letter password, making it easy to break in.

There are also reports that a cyberattack destroyed a water pump belonging to a Springfield, IL water utility. There are mixed reports that an attacker gained unauthorized access to that company’s industrial control system.

According to DailyWireless, Supervisory Control And Data Acquisition (SCADA) software monitors and controls various industrial processes, some of which are considered critical infrastructure.

Researchers have warned about attacks on critical infrastructure for some time, but warnings became reality after a highly complicated computer worm, Stuxnet, attacked and destroyed centrifuges at a uranium enrichment facility in Iran.

German cybersecurity expert Ralph Langner found Stuxnet, the most advanced worm he had ever seen. The cybersecurity expert warns that U.S. utility companies are not ready to deal with the threat.

In a TED Talk Langner stated that “The leading force behind Stuxnet is the cyber superpower – there is only one, and that’s the United States.”

In a recent speech at the Brookings Institution, he also made the bigger point that having developed Stuxnet as a computer weapon, the United States has in effect introduced it into the world’s cyber-arsenal.

Related articles

New NIST Report Sheds Some Light On Security Of The Smart Grid

NISTDarkReading reports the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) released a report (PDF) by the Cyber Security Coordination Task Group. The report from the Task Group which heads up the security strategy and architecture for the nation’s smart power grid includes risk assessment, security priorities, as well as privacy issues.

The smart grid makes the electrical power grid a two-way flow of data and electricity allows consumers to remotely monitor their power usage in real-time to help conserve energy and save money. DarkReading says researchers have raised red flags about the security of the smart grid. Some have already poked holes in the grid, including IOActive researcher Mike Davis, who found multiple vulnerabilities in smart meters, including devices that don’t use encryption nor do they authenticate users when updating software. He was able to execute buffer overflow attacks and unleash rootkits on smart meters.

Tony Flick, a smart grid expert with FYRM Associates, at Black Hat USA talked (PDF) about his worries over utilities “self-policing” their implementations of the security framework. “This is history repeating itself,” Mr. Flick said in an interview with DarkReading.

According to DarkReading, the report recommends smart grid vendors carry out some pretty basic security practices:

  • Audit personally identifiable information (PII) data access and changes;
  • Specify the purpose for collecting, using, retaining, and sharing PII;
  • Collect only PII data that’s needed;
  • Anonymize PII data where possible and keep it only as long as necessary;
  • Advanced Metering Infrastructure (AMI) must set up protections against denial-of-service (DoS) attacks;
  • Network perimeter devices should filter certain types of packets to protect devices on an organization’s internal network from being directly affected by denial-of-service attacks;
  • The AMI system should use redundancy or excess capacity to reduce the impact of a DoS;
  • AMI components accessible to the public must be in separate subnetworks with separate physical network interfaces;
  • The AMI system shall deny network traffic by default and allows network traffic by exception;
  • Consumers’ access to smart grid meters be limited. Authorization and access levels need to be carefully considered.
Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

40 Years of Malware – Part 4

40 Years of Malware - Part 42011 marks the 40th anniversary of the computer virus. Help Net Security notes that over the last four decades, malware instances have grown from 1,300 in 1990, to 50,000 in 2000, to over 200 million in 2010. Fortinet (FTNT) marks this dubious milestone with an article that counts down some of the malware evolution low-lights.

The Sunnyvale, CA network security firm says that viruses evolved from academic proof of concepts to geek pranks which have evolved into cybercriminal tools. By 2005, the virus scene had been monetized, and almost all viruses developed for the sole purpose of making money via more or less complex business models. According to FortiGuard Labs, the most significant computer viruses over the last 40 years are:

See Part 1 Here  – See Part 2 Here  – See Part 3 Here  – See Part 4 Here

Botnets2007 – By 2007, Botnets have infected millions worldwide using Zombie systems to send spam to generate Denial of Service (DoS) attacks, compromised passwords, and data. By 2007 cybercriminals had developed a lucrative business model they were protecting. The attackers became more concerned about protecting their zombie computers. Until 2007, botnets lacked robustness, by neutralizing its unique Control Center (PDF), a botnet could be taken down because Zombies didn’t have anyone to report to (and take commands from) anymore. The Storm botnet was the first to feature a peer-to-peer architecture (PDF) to decentralize its command and control functions. At the peak of the outbreak, the Storm Botnet was more powerful than many supercomputers and accounted for 8% of all malware running in the world according to FortiGuard.

Koobface2008Koobface (an anagram for Facebook) spreads by pretending to be the infected user on social networks, prompting friends to download an update to their Flash player to view a video. The update is a copy of the virus. Once infected, users would serve as both vectors of infection for other social network contacts and as human robots to solve CAPTCHA challenges for cyber-criminals, among other things. Koobface is also the first botnet to recruit its Zombie computers across multiple social networks (Facebook, MySpace, hi5, Bebo, Friendster, etc). FortiGuard estimates that over 500,000 Koobface zombies are online at the same time.

Conficker2009Conficker (aka Downadup) is a particularly sophisticated and long-lived virus, as it’s both a worm, much like Sasser, and an ultra-resilient botnet, which downloads destructive code from a random Internet server. (We still see it pop-up from time to time at work). Conficker targeted the Microsoft Windows OS and used Windows flaws and Dictionary attacks on admin passwords to crack machines and link them to a computer under the control of the attacker. Conficker’s weakness is its propagation algorithm is poorly calibrated, causing it to be discovered more often according to Fortinet. In 2009 some networks were so saturated by Conficker, that it caused planes to be grounded, hospitals and military bases were impacted. Conficker infected bout 7 million systems worldwide.

Advanced Persistent ThreatAdvanced Persistent Threat (aka APT, Operation Aurora) was a cyber attack that began in mid-2009 and continued through December 2009. The attack was first publicly disclosed by Google (GOOG) on January 12, 2010, in a blog post. In the blog post, Google said the attack originated in China and was both sophisticated and well resourced and consistent with an advanced persistent threat attack. According to Wikipedia the attack also included Adobe (ADBE), Dow Chemical (DOW), Juniper Networks (JNPR), Morgan Stanley (MS), Northrop Grumman,(NOC), Rackspace (RAX), Symantec (SYMC), and Yahoo (YHOO). There is speculation that the primary goal of the attack was to gain access to and potentially change source code repositories at these high-tech, security, and defense contractor companies.

The definition of an Advanced Persistent Threat depends on who you ask, Greg Hoglund, CEO at HBGary told Network World an Advanced Persistent Threat is a nice way for the Air Force and DoD to not have to keep saying “Chinese state-sponsored threat.” He says,” APT is “the Chinese government’s state-sponsored espionage that’s been going on for 20 years,” Mr. Hoglund told Network World.

Stuxnet USB2010 Stuxnet‘s discovery in September 2010 ushered in the era of cyberwar. According to most threat researchers today, only governments have the necessary resources to design and implement a virus of such complexity. Stuxnet is the first piece of malware specifically designed to sabotage nuclear power plants. It can be regarded as the first advanced tool of cyber-warfare. Stuxnet was almost certainly a joint U.S. / Israeli creation for damaging the Iranian nuclear weapons program, which it did, by destroying a thousand centrifuges used for uranium enrichment.

To spread, Stuxnet exploited several critical vulnerabilities in Microsoft (MSFT) Windows, which, until then, were unknown, including one guaranteeing its execution when inserting an infected USB key into the target system, even if a systems autorun capabilities were disabled. From the infected system, Stuxnet was then able to spread into an internal network, until it reached its target: a Siemens industrial software system that run Iran’s Bushehr nuclear reactor and most likely intended to destroy or neutralize the industrial system.

Duqu2011Duqu is the current star in the world of malware but, as history shows, that fame will be short-lived. Just like fashion models, modern malware has a lifespan in the media eye of a couple of weeks to a couple of months, tops. They then fade into the shadow of more dangerous and advanced tools, according to Help Net Security.

Gary Warner, director of Research in Computer Forensics in the UAB College of Arts and Sciences blogged that Duqu is a data-stealing program that shares several blocks of code with Stuxnet. In fact, one of the two pieces of malware we’ve seen that is described as being Duqu is also detected as Stuxnet by some AV vendors.

Symantec disclosed in their report that one of the infections they were analyzing was infected via a Word Document that exploited the system using a previously unknown 0-day attack.

On November 3, 2011, Microsoft released a Microsoft Security Advisory (2639658) Vulnerability in TrueType Font Parsing Could Allow Elevation of Privilege. The advisory starts with an executive summary which says, in part:

Microsoft is investigating a vulnerability in a Microsoft Windows component, the Win32k TrueType font parsing engine. An attacker who successfully exploited this vulnerability could run arbitrary code in kernel mode. The attacker could then install programs; view, change, or delete data; or create new accounts with full user rights. We are aware of targeted attacks that try to use the reported vulnerability; overall, we see low customer impact at this time. This vulnerability is related to the Duqu malware.

rb-

Every couple of years a new malware is crowned the most innovative or dangerous cyber threat in the wild. The anti-malware industry is built on a game of chicken between malware creators and anti-malware creators, with end users stuck squarely in the middle. As this series of articles has shown this game has gone on for 40 years since computers were bigger than many houses and were as user-friendly as the DMV.

 

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Lessons From Botnet Demise

Lessons From Botnet DemiseBrian Krebs on the Washington Post blog Security Fix profiled a case where a bot-herder killed 100,000 zombie clients in his botnet. The bot-herder implemented a “kill operating system” or kos command resident in the Zeus bot-net crimeware. The kos command caused the infected PCs to Blue Screen of Death (BSOD). The Madrid-based security services firm S21sec reports that invoking the kos command only results in a blue screen and subsequent difficulty booting the OS. There appears to be no significant data loss and neither the Trojan binaries nor the start-up registries are removed, In this post, they look at what happens to an infected computer when it receives a Zeus kos.

Russian botnet

The Zeus crimeware was designed by the Russian A-Z to harvest financial and personal data from PCs with a Trojan. UK Computer security firm Prevx found the Zeus crimeware available for just $4,000. The fee includes a DIY “exe builder” which incorporates a kernel-level rootkit. According to the Prevx this means it can hide from even the most advanced home or corporate security software. RSA detailed the capabilities of Zeus crimeware in 2008. Zeus also includes advanced “form injection capabilities” that allows it to change web pages displayed by websites as they are served on the user’s PC. For example, criminals can add an extra field or fields to a banking website asking for credit card numbers, social security numbers, etc. The bogus field makes it look like the bank is asking you for this data after you have logged on and you believe you are securely connected to your bank.

rb-

The reason for BSODing 100,000 machines isn’t quite clear. Several security experts have offered up their opinions including S21sec and Zeustracker (currently down due to an apparent DDOS). What is clear are the implications of this action.

Botnets and their related crimeware are dangerous for more and more reasons. They can steal massive amounts of personal data. They can launch denial-of-service attacks and they can execute code. I agree with Krebs that the scarier reality about malicious software is that these programs leave ultimate control over victim machines in the hands of the attacker.

Politically motivated attackers

For the time being, it is still in the best interests of the attackers to leave the compromised systems in place. They can plunder more information. However, imagine the social chaos created if 9 million PCs infected with Conflicker including hospitals from Utah to the UK were under the control of Al-Queda or other similarly minded groups. These politically motivated attackers could order all the infected machines to BSOD, creating computer-enhanced chaos. One of the forgotten lessons of 9-11 is that our technology can be hi-jacked and turned against us.  This could be the opening into a new type of cyber warfare.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.