Tag Archive for FUD

What is 5G ?

What is 5G ?Updated 07/16/2019 – Qualcomm released the Snapdragon 855 Plus. It features a Kryo 486 CPU Prime core with a clock speed of 2.96 GHz and a 15% faster Adreno 640 GPU. Qualcomm claimed in a presser, the 855 Plus would deliver better coverage and all-day battery life in 5G devices.

AT&T (T), Verizon (VZ), Sprint (S), and other carriers are hyping 5G. But what exactly is 5G? If you believe the hype, it is the greatest thing since sliced bread. 5G will improve our homes, make our cities safer, our machines smarter, our cars driverless, our entertainment mobile and our phones faster. So what is the tech behind the hype?

When 5G really gets here will bring three improvements to current wireless: greater speed, lower latency, and more connections.  The real advantages of 5G will come in massive capacity and lower latency. The standards bodies involved are aiming at 20Gbps speeds and 1ms latency.

Work on 5G started 10-15 years before anything went commercial. Marcus Weldon, CTO, and president of Nokia Bell Labs told FierceWireless. Finally, in 2017, the 3rd Generation Partnership Project, the standards body that writes the rules for wireless connectivity, agreed on the first specification for 5G. The Non-Standalone Specification of 5G New Radio standard covers 600 and 700 MHz bands and the 50 GHz millimeter-wave end of the spectrum. But, as followers of the Bach Seat know, a standard doesn’t mean that it will work the same, or what applications it will enable.

The G in this 5G means it's a generation of wireless technologyThe G in this 5G means it’s a generation of wireless technology. PC Magazine says, most wireless generations have technically been defined by their data transmission speeds, each has also been marked by a break in encoding methods, or “air interfaces,” that make it incompatible with the previous generation. The earlier G’s were:

  • 1G was analog cellular.
  • 2G technologies, such as CDMA, GSM, and TDMA, were launched in 1991 the first generation of digital cellular technologies without much concern for data transmission or the mobile Web.
  • 3G technologies, such as EVDO, HSPA, and UMTS, brought speeds from 200kbps to a few megabits per second. It focused on applications in voice telephony, mobile Internet, video calls, and mobile TV.
  • 4G technologies, such as WiMAX and LTE, were the next incompatible leap forward, and they are now scaling up to hundreds of megabits and even gigabit-level speeds. 4G was designed to better support IP telephony, video conferencing, and cloud computing, as well as video streaming and online gaming.

The actual 5G radio system, known as 5G-NR, isn’t compatible with 4G. But for the foreseeable future, all US 5G devices will need 4G to set up 5G connections where it’s available. That’s technically known as a non-standalone,” or NSA, network. Later 5G networks will become “standalone,” or SA, not requiring 4G coverage to work.

Like other cellular networks, 5G networks use a system of cell sites that divide their territory into sectors and send encoded data through radio waves according to PCMag. Each cell site requires a network backbone connection, whether through a wired or wireless backhaul connection. 5G networks use a type of encoding called OFDM.

5G is designed to carry higher speeds by using much larger channels than 4G. While most 4G channels are 20MHz, bonded together into up to 160MHz at a time, 5G channels can be up to 100MHz, with Verizon using as much as 800MHz at a time. That’s a much broader highway, but it also requires larger, clear blocks of airwaves than were available for 4G. PCMag cites Qualcomm (QCOM) claims that 5G will be able to boost capacity by four times over current systems by leveraging wider bandwidths and advanced antenna technologies.

5G primarily runs in two kinds of airwaves: below and above 6GHz. Low-frequency 5G networks, which use existing cellular and Wi-Fi bands, take advantage of more flexible encoding and bigger channel sizes to achieve speeds 25 to 50 percent better than LTE, according to a presentation by T-Mobile (TMUS) exec Karri Kuoppamaki.

Those networks can cover the same distances as existing cellular networks and generally won’t need more cell sites.  Rural networks will likely be stuck with low-band 5G, because low-frequency bands have a great range from cell towers.

To get super-high, multi-gigabit speeds, carriers are turning to newer, much higher frequencies, known as millimeter wave (mmWave). In the existing cellular bands, only relatively narrow channels are available because that spectrum is so busy and heavily used. But up at 28GHz and 39GHz, there are big, broad swathes of spectrum available to create big channels for very high speeds.

The 28GHz and 39GHz bands have previously only been used for backhaul. But they haven’t been used for consumer devices before, because the handheld processing power and miniaturized antennas weren’t available. Millimeter wave signals also drop off faster with distance than lower-frequencies, and the massive amount of data they transfer will need more connections to landline internet. So cellular providers will have to use many smaller, lower-power base stations rather than fewer, more powerful macrocells to offer the multi-gigabit speeds that millimeter wave networks promise.

There’s a third set of 5G airwaves being used overseas. These frequencies, ranging from 3.5GHz to 7GHz. These are slightly above current cellular bands but have quantities of the spectrum (speed) that approaches mmWave. The US is falling behind other countries in the mid-band spectrum because over here, it’s being used for satellite communications and the Navy.

Bell Labs’ Weldon, described his idea of a true 5G network for FierceWireless;

you need a low band that gives you nationwide coverage—higher efficiency on it; a mid-band for high-capacity, relatively locally; and millimeter-wave for super high-capacity, extremely locally, and if you blend all those together, you’ve got a network that really is significant.

Some believe that mmWave 5G will not work. T-Mobile CTO Neville Ray wrote that millimeter-wave won’t be able to deliver on the promise of 5G because it doesn’t travel far. Jeffrey Moore, principal analyst at Wave7 Research told FierceWireless. “…there are definitely some concerns about the economics of 5G.”

rb-

5G is an investment for the next decade. It is unlikely that the next big application will drop in 5G until 2021 or 2022. It is likely that a true 5G iPhone won’t appear until later 2020 and Qualcomm will not release its second-generation Snapdragon X55 5G modem until late 2019. The new chip will support all major spectrum types and bands. Qualcomm claims it is capable of 7Gbps downloads. Until then, the wireless carriers will jockey for customers and mind share.

The providers desperately need 5G to boost smartphone sales. The smartphone market is saturated. Deloitte found (PDF) that 80% of people in developed nations now own a smartphone and wait up to 4 years to replace their device – a significant increase from the 2-year refresh rate in 2011-12.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Do Christmas Lights Slow Wi-Fi?

Do Christmas Lights Slow Wi-Fi?A new holiday tradition is to spread FUD about how your Christmas lights can interfere with your Wi-Fi signal. This year’s holiday Wi-Fi FUD spreader is the UK communications regulator Ofcom. Ofcom hinted that “Fairy Lights” may slow down your 2.4 GHz Wi-Fi signal and everyone went crazy.

Christmas lightsThe theoretical science says it does. C|Net explains that Wi-Fi uses radio waves. Christmas lights emit a very weak electromagnetic field. So theoretically, they can interfere with the radio waves being transmitted from your Wi-Fi router. The more lights, the stronger the electromagnetic field. Also, the closer the lights are to the router, the more it may interfere with the Wi-Fi.

The truth about holiday light interfere

Communications technology consultant Stuart Lipoff, told C|Net how you’re affected really comes down to what type of Christmas lights you use. The older technology that was used to make the lights blink can indeed cause radio interference. The interference could happen if the holiday lights were arranged in series with each other. The total number of lamps in the string could be such that the combined voltage of all of them was equal to the 110 volts in a typical U.S. home.

Christmas lights

However modern Christmas tree lights are based on solid-state LEDs. They often use an external electronic flashing controller and do not create radio noise. However, there are some LEDs that have an extra blink-controlled chip right inside the LED bulb. It turns out that these devices also create significant radio interference. The Wi-Fi interference occurs as this internal controller cycles the LED chip from on to off. The reason is somewhat analogous to the spark problem in incandescent blinker bulbs. When the LED is between fully on and fully off it can show negative resistance that causes it to creates radio energy.

Christmas lightsYou can simulate this by taking an AM radio. Tune the radio to a frequency, not in use in your area, and switching something on and off rapidly a few times. You should hear a staticky sound. The same thing can be heard during a lightning storm.

The real Wi-Fi killers

Alina Bradford at C|Net tested the theory and found there was a slight variance, be it ever so slight. She says “the variance isn’t a big deal.”

  • PC World says the real Wi-Fi killers are households items that are on 365 days. These will disrupt your Wi-Fi a lot more than your Christmas lights. Microwaves are the worst of the lot, as it’s basically a metal box that when turned on uses high-powered microwaves at around 2.4 GHz (the same frequency as Wi-Fi). This creates a black hole around it for Wi-Fi signals.
    washing machinesOther culprits include ovens, freezers, fridges, washing machines, dishwashers… you name it. If it’s metal and has liquid-filled pipes, it’s going to kill your Wi-Fi signal according to Panda security.
    Cordless phones are also problematic. They’re often more of an issue because you’re more likely to have a portable phone on your desk than a microwave.
    Televisions and speakers are basically just electromagnets and will hurt Wi-Fi performance when placed directly near a router.
    Your neighbor’s router. Depending on how close your router is to someone else’s, there can be a direct effect on its performance. This might prove to be even more problematic if you live in an apartment. In an apartment, you could be exposed to different signals from all sides. This means that the more interference that there is, the more your router ups it’s broadcasting, This causes your neighbor’s router to do the same… which just perpetuates the problem.
    TelevisionWater pipes can also cause interference because water absorbs radio waves.
    Walls don’t generate electromagnetic fields, but they do weaken Wi-Fi signals that pass through (up to 25 dB’s can be lost).
    Humans – Yes, you too are a problem! We, humans, are 55% – 60% water, which makes us a fantastic absorber of Wi-Fi.

Things to do improve your Wi-Fi

Panda Security also suggests a few things you can do to improve your Wi-Fi.

  • Open your doors – Closed doors could effectively block or degrade wireless signals.
  • Adjust your Wi-Fi channel – The typical default is channel 6, your router may do this automatically. If you change your Wi-Fi channel you may find that there is less interference from other routers near to you. Any two channels separated by five or more do not overlap.
  • Change your channelChange your Wi-Fi Frequency The most common Wi-Fi frequency is 2.4GHz.  2.4GHz is also the most polluted. Try using 5.0 GHz. Like changing your Wi-Fi Channel your router may do this automatically. If you change your Wi-Fi frequency you may find that there is less interference from other routers near to you. You will need to check your devices to see if they support 5.0 GHz Wi-Fi, some older devices, like Apple iPhone 4’s do not.
  • Place your router in the center of your home. A router transmits the signal in all directions, so it makes sense to have it at the center of the home. Unfortunately, this isn’t always possible due to the cables that come with it.
  • Check your cables – In general, a shorter and higher quality cable will mean a faster connection speed. It is better to use Ethernet cables from your modem to a separate router than run long phone cables.
  • Invest in a new router – There’s no need to break the bank on a new, fancy router. However, some of the newer Wi-Fi routers on the market offer a notable boost in signal and speed.
  • Turn your house into a Faraday cage. Build a Faraday cage to eliminate all outside sources of electromagnetic pollution. But would also mean no telephone or FM connections.

Of course, you should also take precautions to ensure that your Wi-Fi connection is secure by putting a strong password on your router and use a modern security setting like WPA2-PSK (AES).

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Mobile Malware FUD?

Mobile Malware FUD?Just last week, I wondered out loud from my Bach Seat if all the hype around mobile malware was real or just more FUD. Looks like I am not alone, TechCo recently asked a similar question, “Are We Overstating the Threats from Mobile Devices?

mobile threatsThe author cites several recent reports that back up the claim that the actual mobile threats that mobile devices introduce into the enterprise are overstated. The data indicates that the mobile malware threat is statistically small and has even decreased since 2012.

• A McAfee report shows out of all the malware now out there, only 1.9% of it is mobile malware. The author equates the mobile threat to 4 million / 195 million McAfee knows about.
• Another report (PDF) from Verizon (VZ) shows even lower numbers, with only 0.03 percent of smartphones being infected with what is called “higher grade malicious code.”
hit by lighting• But some numbers go even lower than that. Damballa, a mobile security vendor that monitors roughly half of mobile data traffic, recently released a report that claims you have a better chance of getting hit by lightning than by mobile malware. Dramballa found only 9,688 smartphones out of more than 150 million showed signs of malware infection. If you do the math, that comes out to an infection rate of 0.0064 percent.

Even more interesting is that despite the increase in mobile devices, Damballa found the infection rate had declined by half compared to 2012.

Walled gardenThese reports may show mobile threats aren’t as big of a problem as previously thought, but the author asks, why the numbers are so low at all. After all, cybercriminals like to target new platforms and exploit security weaknesses. Why do they seem to be avoiding mobile devices?

The truth of the matter is that mobile users tend to get their apps from high-quality app stores. The stores from Google (GOOG) and Apple (AAPL) work to filter out suspicious apps. If malware is found in apps after they’ve already been on the market for a while, app stores can also execute a kill switch, which takes the app off the store and the devices where they were downloaded. This limits malware’s ability to spread.

remotely wipe devicesThe article concludes that companies that adopt BYOD should just ignore BYOD security; they just don’t have to go all-out as many businesses have done. Most mobile security experts say a mobile device management system remains a good investment to make sure mobile devices are handled appropriately. MDM systems also allow an organization to remotely wipe devices, thus keeping sensitive data safe in the event a device is lost or stolen. But malware really isn’t a factor in those cases, so the overall message from these recent reports is that getting worked up over mobile threats is not necessary. A company can still gain all the benefits of BYOD without having to worry incessantly over what they’re doing to protect every device that connects to their network.

rb-

What do you think?

Is mobile malware over-hyped FUD?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

 

Related articles
  • Your BYOD implementation checklist (powermore.dell.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.