Tag Archive for Mergers and Acquisition

Who Owns Ruckus Today?

Updated December 05, 2017 – As predicated below, cable box maker, ARRIS International completed its acquisition of Ruckus Wireless from Broadcom in December 2017. According to reports, “Ruckus Networks, an ARRIS company,” will operate as a dedicated business under the ARRIS Enterprise Networks business segment.

Who Owns Ruckus Today?Ruckus Wireless was founded in 2004 and supplied Wi-Fi services and equipment to enterprises and service providers. At its peak, it had annual revenues of almost $400 million and more than 1,000 employees. Ruckus was the first firm to roll out enterprise 802.11ac Wave 2 AP. The company’s products powered high-profile public Wi-Fi installations, such as New York City’s LinkNYC.

Ruckus WirelessIn April 2016, San Jose, CA-based Brocade purchased Ruckus Wireless in a deal worth about $1.5 billion. Brocade is most famous for data center SAN switches and a player on the NFV and SDN scene. Brocade planned to add Ruckus’s Wi-Fi products to its enterprise networking business.

At the time of the purchase, Brocade CEO Lloyd Carney said, “The acquisition will strengthen Brocade’s ability to pursue emerging market opportunities around 5G mobile services, Internet of Things (IoT), Smart Cities, OpenG technology for in-building wireless, and LTE/Wi-Fi convergence.

Brocade Networks logoRuckus changed hands. Irvine, CA-based chipmaker Broadcom (AVGO), which supplies to phone vendors purchased Brocade for $5.9 billion. But the chipmaker said it plans to divest the Brocade IP networking business that consists of wireless networking, data center switching, and software networking offerings.

Brocade CEO Lloyd Carney wrote on the company’s website. “In terms of our IP Networking business, due to competitive overlap with some of Broadcom’s most important customers, Broadcom will seek a buyer for the business.” The Ruckus product line competes with industry titans like Cisco and Apple.

BroadcomBroadcom logo CEO Hock Tan said in a press release, “… we will find a great home for Brocade’s valuable IP networking business that will best position that business for its next phase of growth.” It seems Broadcom has found a firm willing to take Ruckus off their hands.

FierceCable is reporting that cable set-top box manufacturer Arris (ARRS) is in talks with Broadcom to pay around $1 billion for Brocade’s wireless network edge business – i.e Ruckus Wireless. The article says Arris CFO David Potts told investors that the vendor might transition into serving the wireless needs of its customers. Arris client, Comcast is developing a wireless service based on its MVNO relationship with Verizon.

Arris logoReports are that Arris does not want to buy other parts of the business being divested by Brocade. Brocade is reportedly looking for a buyer for the rest of its IP portfolio, which includes data centers, switching, and software.

Related articles

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Autotask Sold

Autotask SoldRedmond Channel Partner is reporting that Vista Equity Partners is acquiring Autotask Corp. RCP says Autotask is one of the most significant vendors for managed services providers. The article reports the private equity firm is buying Autotask for an undisclosed sum. Vista’s $11.5-billion portfolio includes Aptean, Websense, and at least 20 vertically focused technology companies. The announcement came during Autotask’s 2014 Community Live! show in Miami.

Autotask logoMark Cattini, president and CEO of Autotask, issued a statement to RCP, which says all the proper things, about aggressively improving Autotask’s solutions for customers.

We are devoted to our clients’ ongoing success and are confident that our partnership with Vista will drive innovation and growth and delivery dynamic solutions as the traditional IT landscape evolves.

Managed Service ProviderAlan Cline, principal at Vista Equity Partners, indicated that Autotask’s focus on IT service providers as core customers would continue. He also claimed the firm would help improve the product. He said in a statement to RCP  to “work with the Autotask team to expand and enhance the company’s solutions to help IT service providers more efficiently and effectively meet their client’s changing needs.”

The article claims this is just the latest step in the consolidation of the remote monitoring and management (RMM) market arena. RCP says this trend got rolling with a growth equity firm backing the 2011 spinoff of what eventually became Continuum from Zenith Infotech, followed by 2013’s private equity-funded acquisition and internal development spree at Kaseya, along with new owners for N-Able Technologies (SolarWinds) and Level Platforms Inc. (AVG Technologies).

rb-

FrustratedI have used the Autotask project module and IMHO it really needs help. My first beef is not fully with Autotask, rather it is with all SaaS-based applications, every time a task is updated, Autotask immediately sends the change thru the Inter-tubes and slows down any project planning to a crawl, especially when you are used to using Microsoft (MSFT) Project on a LAN.

Speaking of Project, Autotask has no way to directly import any of your existing mpp’s. The best that an Autotask “consultant” could do was have me export the mpp to an xls via Project and then import that into Autotask. Really?

There are not a lot of real-time tools in Autotask like Team Planner and Task Inspector.

All-in-all, the project piece of Autotask was a net loss. The new owners of Autotask have their work cut out for them if they are going to make their acquisition profitable.

Related articles
  • OpenDNS Integrates with Autotask to Centralize Security and Account Management for Partners (hispanicbusiness.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

More Fiber in the D

Mergers an d acquistionsUpdated – August 1, 2017 – Lightower Fiber Networks has agreed to be acquired by Crown Castle International Corp. for approx. $7.1 billion in cash. The deal is expected to close by the end of 2017.

Update – May 01, 2015 – Fibertech Networks was bought by Lightower Fiber Networks in a $1.9 billion all-cash deal that will create a fiber powerhouse in the eastern U.S.

More Fiber in the DRochester, New York-based Fibertech Networks plans to install more than 750 route miles of new fiber optic cable in Metro Detroit. This is the company’s 30th U.S. metro network. This will add more Detroit markets to their over 12,000 route miles of fiber-only network infrastructure. The area to be served include Trenton, Canton Township, Dearborn, Southfield, Warren, Troy, and Chesterfield Township.

Fibertech NetworksThis is a major expansion for Fibertech and an important step in our development as one of the largest and fastest-growing metro fiber providers in the eastern U.S.,” said John K. Purcell, chair and CEO of Fibertech, told  BusinessWire that the move was “an economic development initiative that we believe will help foster telecom competition, and business and employment growth.

The company’s service offering encompasses both dark fiber and optical broadband. They offer their facilities to businesses that have predominately used traditional carriers and lines in the past. The company’s services include point-to-point and multi-point Ethernet services with speeds ranging from 5 Mbps to 100 Gbps. They also offer DWDM, dedicated Internet access, and collocation.

Fibertech Networks network

Other fiber markets

In addition to Detroit, Fibertech has networks working in Pittsburgh, Pa.; Indianapolis; Akron, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Columbus, Dayton, and Toledo, Ohio. Markets on the east coast include Providence, R.I.; Hartford, Bridgeport, Stamford, Danbury, New London, and New Haven, Conn.; Springfield and Worcester, Mass. They also have fiber facilities in Syracuse, Rochester, Buffalo, Binghamton, White Plains, and Albany, N.Y.; Wilmington, Del.; Montgomery County, Md.; Trenton, Newark and Atlantic City, N.J.; and Philadelphia.

Fiber optic cableThis new network expansion is a natural 2013 extension of our market footprint given our growing presence in the Midwest and, most recently, our extension into five new markets in Ohio including Toledo,” said Mr. Purcell.

Fibertech was founded in May 2000, has built metro-area fiber networks in 29 mid-size markets in the eastern United States, and is led by Court Square Capital Partners of New York City. The company owns and operates a fiber-optic network of more than 9,500 route miles, which has more than 8,100 on-net locations with nearly 2,100 cell sites with its fiber-only network infrastructure.

rb-

For the old-timers out there, remember Link-Michigan?

Another failed broadband initiative from Lansing. Fiber networks are a key to economic development. If the State can’t do what is right for its citizens, then the private sector will.

OMG did I just turn into a republican?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Wall Street Investing Like It’s 1999

Wall Street Investing Like It’s 1999 The New York Times reports that banks are pouring money into technology funds, wealthy clients and institutions are clamoring to get pieces of start-ups, expectations of stock market debuts building. As the Wall Street machinery kicks into second gear, some investors with memories of the Internet bust a decade earlier are wondering whether this sudden burst of activity spells danger for the industry once again.

With all this exuberance, valuations are soaring. Investments in Facebook and Zynga have more than quintupled the implied worth of each company in the last two years. The social shopping site Groupon is considering an initial public offering that would value the company at $25 billion. Less than a year ago, the company was valued at $1.4 billion.

I worry that investors think every social company will be as good as Facebook,” said Roger McNamee, a managing director of Elevation Partners and an investor in Facebook, who co-founded the private equity fund Silver Lake Partners in 1999 at the height of the boom. “You have an attractive set of companies right now, but it would be surprising if the next wave of social companies had as much impact as the first.

WebvanThe NYT points out the example of the online grocer, Webvan. WebVan was one of the most highly anticipated I.P.O.s of the dot-com era. The business had raised nearly $1 billion in start-up capital from institutions like Softbank of Japan, Sequoia Capital, and Goldman Sachs. Goldman, its lead underwriter, invested about $100 million. On its first day, investors cheered as Webvan’s market value soared, rising 65 percent to about $8 billion at the close. Less than two years later, Webvan was bankrupt.

Thomas Weisel, the founder of an investment bank called the Thomas Weisel Partners Group that prospered in the first Internet boom, says he is “astounded” by the amount of money now flooding the markets. “I think it’s much greater today,” he told the NYT. “The pools of capital that are looking at these Internet companies are far greater today than what you had in 2000.”

Yet there are notable differences between the turn-of-the-century dot-com boom and now. For one, the tech start-ups that have attracted so much interest from investors have real businesses — not just eyeballs and clicks. Companies like Facebook have fast-growing revenue. Groupon, which has been profitable since June 2009, is on track to take in billions in revenue this year reports the paper. And since 1999, when 248 million people were online (less than 5 percent of the world’s population), broadband Internet and personal computing have become mainstream. About one in three people are online, or roughly two billion users, according to data from Internet World Stats, a Web site that compiles such numbers.

Today, the collective amount of money that Wall Street banks are pumping into Internet start-ups, on top of the surging cash piles from venture capital groups, hedge funds, and private equity, is a major concern for some investors.

Over the last five months, the NYT says many venture capital players have raised giant amounts of capital. One Facebook investor, Accel Partners, is about to raise $2 billion for investments in China and the United States, while Bessemer Venture Partners will be closing in on $1.5 billion for a new fund. Greylock Partners, Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz, and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers have collectively raised more than $3 billion in the last six months.

rb-

I can do my job without the social networker, I think the infographic above show that the VCs are no better than Wall Street, moving in a herd to Facebook. At least in 1999, the VCs were all over the place now they have settled on 5 firms.

They certainly have not made it easy for any other new ideas to get funded. The VC community has also concentrated its risk on these firms. All of these firms may be sexy on the coasts, but the only one that is relevant to me in Detroit is LinkedIn.

What do you think?

Is it 1999 again?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Facebook Tried to Buy Twitter

Facebook Tried to Buy Twitter

-Updated 02-12-2011- The Wall Street Journal is reporting that in recent weeks executives from both Facebook Inc. and Google Inc., (GOOG) have been talking about the acquisition of Twitter.  According to the WSJ, the potential suitors have placed an estimated valuation on Twitter of $8 billion to $10 billion.  In case you weren’t paying attention, that is a 3x increase in three months since December 2010 when it was Twitter was valued at $3.7 billion.

Imagine the Bizarro World where social networkers Facebook and Twitter hooked up. In a recent Financial Times interview with Twitter co-founder Biz Stone, he revealed that in 2008, Facebook tried to buy Twitter for $500 million in Facebook stock.

Facebook saw the potential in Twitter but the Twitter big-wigs declined. Mr. Stone told the FT that Twitter wanted to become not just a popular site but a viable business, and not be taken over by another company. “We’ve created something that people are finding value in,” he told the FT. “But we haven’t yet created a business out of this, and we really wanted to do that.”

It is possible that if Facebook had bought Twitter it would have died. As a part of Facebook, Twitter would have been restricted to only one set of users and is unlikely to have gone through its huge period of rapid growth. Its main financial power has been in business and less in social networking according to the FT.

Twitter had 175 million registered users as of November 1, 2010, who sent about 95 million messages a day or 25 billion “tweets” last year. Twitter has pursued rapid growth over profits, but since last spring, it has brought in advertising revenues through paid for “promoted tweets.” In mid-December, Twitter said it had received a major infusion of funds from a group of investors, which reportedly put a $3.7 billion value on the site.

rb-

Well, a valuation of  $3.7 billion or $500 million in Facebook vapor stock seems the Twitter boys did OK for themselves.

Is Twitter worth $3.7 billion? Does it have a business model to support $3.7 billion?

Is Facebook worth $50 billion?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.