Tag Archive for MSFT

Tablets Still Don’t Rule the World

Tablets Still Don't Rule the WorldThe rise of tablets like Apple’s (AAPL) iPadSamsung‘s (005930) Galaxy Tab, and the Google (GOOG) Nexus have grabbed PC buyers’ attention and dollars for several years at the expense of the PC market. Lately, however, it seems that the carnage in the PC market has stabilized. And the growth of the mighty Apple iPad has plateaued.

iPhone, iPad, and iPod sales

iPhone, iPad, and iPod sales from Q1 06 to Q3 14 (in million units) | Statista

Cloud computingCould this be because there is no real business case for the tablets? After being on the market for several years, they have not replaced the PC at work. Don Reisinger at eWeek, recently put out 10 reasons why tablets still cannot replace PCs where he argues that the Post-PC Era is yet not a done deal. He argues despite their popularity, tablets still aren’t powerful or capable enough to replace PCs. He states in the article tablets cannot–and will not–replace PCs. Let’s look at his reasons why.

1. Component power

Over the last few years, mobile components running in tablets have gained in power. However, processors such as NVidia’s (NVDA) Tegra 3 or Apple’s A6X still pale in comparison to the power delivered in PC chips from Intel (INTC) or AMD (AMD). Until that changes, tablets can never replace PCs for the power-hungry users among us the author says.

Apple vs. Microsoft2. App availability

Apple’s App Store now offers over 800,000 applications. And although many of them are worthwhile downloads, few actually deliver the complexity and sophistication customers would find in Microsoft (MSFT) Windows or OS X. Nowhere is that more clear than in the comparison of Office on mobile and PCs. Eweek says until apps gain in sophistication, mobile can never keep up.

3. Virtual keyboards aren’t loved

The problem with all tablets is that they come with virtual keyboards. And although more people are warming to virtual keys, there are still many folks around the globe that like having the standard physical keyboard found in PCs. The blog asks why not? Typing on traditional keyboards with two hands is far more accurate and efficient.

virtual keyboard as a reason he does not use a tabletPaul Mah at FierceCIO echoed the authors, citing the virtual keyboard as a reason he does not use a tablet as his primary work device. I have struggled with iPad virtual keyboards, and yes I did try Bluetooth keyboard cases and found them disagreeable.

4. Windows is the enterprise’s favorite

The article notes that Microsoft holds a dominant position in the enterprise. Tablets are just one front on that battlefield. The enterprise is adopting tablets at a rapid rate. But that doesn’t mean that the corporate world is ready to drop Windows for iOS or Android. In fact, Windows is still the most important software solution for enterprise users. Granted, Microsoft is bringing Windows to tablets, but for now, those products aren’t proving popular. Until they do catch on, PCs will win out.

5. Think about enterprise productivity

Productivity in the enterpriseProductivity in the enterprise is extremely important. And on that front, Mr. Reisinger says PCs are still winning out, Forbes recently estimated that MSFT Office market share will drop from its current 95% to 90% by 2016. Notebooks deliver the same level of mobility as tablets, and desktops deliver the power that designers and other employees might need. Simply put, PCs are still the ideal productivity-maximizing solutions for enterprise users.

6. Tablet prices are still too high

Tablets are expensive. The latest iPad launch can set customers back $929 for 128GB of storage and 4G LTE support. A more powerful notebook can be purchased for several hundred dollars less. The author believes that given the state of the economy and the fact that many tech buyers are looking to save cash wherever possible, PCs can’t be considered obsolete in their battle with tablets.

7. Notebooks are turning into tablets

mobile malware eWeek points out that PC vendors have made the smart decision to cut off the rise of tablets by delivering touch functionality in their products. Lenovo’s Yoga, for example, has a screen that can swivel around and sit atop the keyboard to act as a tablet. As more notebooks take on tablet functionality, devices like Apple’s iPad might look like an awfully poor value for the price.

8. More options across the PC market

The sheer number of options available to customers in the PC market is something that can’t be overlooked. From notebooks to laptops to desktops to ultrabooks, there’s something for everyone. Best of all, the components in those products can be customized to match the respective customer’s needs. The blog concludes that choice, outside of storage space, is something sorely lacking in the tablet market. And customers know it.

9. The security advantage is going away

 

Tablet malwareWhen tablets started to make inroads into the PC market, many speculated that it was because of the comparative safety that went along with using such products over notebooks. Now, the author says things have changed. Android is the top target for malicious hackers now, according to several security reports, and has become the next frontier in malware. That could prove extremely troublesome for tablet adoption if things continue to get worse.

10. Tablet OSs need to grow up

Android and iOS, the two most popular tablet operating systems, are nice and effective in the mobile world. But they haven’t grown up yet. Mr. Reisinger says Apple’s iOS, lacks a file system. Android comes in too many flavors for customers to get comfortable with its functionality. Mobile operating systems have to grow up. If they don’t, tablets will never match PCs.

rb-

Huge phoneI just got back from the annual run to the big-box store for Christmas shopping and saw another reason the tablet still does not rule the world. Pfablets.  Some of these things are just as big as an iPad Mini. Now it’s time for a good Gin and Tonic after facing the holi-dazed shopping hordes.

Dell and Intel released a report [pdf] that says the desktop is still the workhorse of the average office. They found that 77% of office tasks are completed with a traditional PC.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Tech Giant Lobbying

Tech Giant LobbyingIn honor of election day, here is some unsettling info from IDG. The research firm reports that 2013 was a record year for computer and internet company spending on lobbying in the U.S., and 2014 is looking set to continue that trend. They presented an infographic that tracks information technology firms’ money spent buying, corrupting, lobbying politicians.

record year for computer and internet company spending on lobbying in the U.S.The article says that advertising, privacy, cybersecurity, patents & IP, tax, immigration, energy, drones, and mobile payments are all issues the tech industry wants to control, dominate influence on Capitol Hill. IDG’s research says that Google was the biggest spender; the search giant spent $3.94M in Q3, an increase from this time last year.

IDG reports that many well-known tech firms have increased their political spending when compared to last year. They report that social networking giant Facebook (FB) has already surpassed its lobbying spend compared to all of last year. Other tech mega-firms that have increased their attempts to buy political power lobbying include:

tech mega-firms have increased their lobbyingMicrosoft (MSFT), historically one of the biggest spenders in this area, was one of the few companies to actually decrease its spending from this time last year, down by a quarter to $1.66M according to the report. It seems a lot of the other legacy enterprise companies are also cutting back. Other companies reducing lobbying spend compared to this time last year are:

Don’t worry about the fat-cats, IDG says there are plenty of other companies also lining politicians pockets spending +/- $1M each on lobbying including the likes of:

2014 Tecch Lobby Spending - IDG

rb-

No wonder Washington is broken, how much of this money goes into the stupid TV ads you can’t escape. Maybe if these firms paid their proper taxes they would not have so much cash to spend buying congress. Oh right – IBM is a person who has rights.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

25 Years of the Firewall

25 Years of the FirewallThe firewall has turned 25 years old this year. In commemoration, McAfee created a timeline of the events that shaped the development of the device most of us rely on the protect ourselves from each other. The infographic shows how the firewall’s evolution coincided with high-profile security events:

These security breaches triggered security developers to react with more advanced firewall technology:

  • 1998: Evasions researched
  • 2009: Native clustering for high availability and performance introduced
  • 2012: Software enabled security introduced, making blade technology obsolete.

The first generation firewalls were called Packet Filters. Packet Filter firewalls look at network addresses and ports of the packet and determine if that packet should be allowed or blocked based on rules programmed by humans. If a packet does not match the packet filter’s ruleset, the packet filter will drop or reject the packet, breaking the connection.

The second generation firewalls do stateful packet inspection. According to Wikipedia, second generation firewalls record all connections passing through it and determines whether a packet is the start of a new connection, a part of an existing connection, or not part of any connection. Though static rules are still used, these rules can now contain a connection state as one of their test criteria.

Third-generation firewalls use application layer filtering which can “understand” certain applications and protocols (such as File Transfer Protocol (FTP), Domain Name System (DNS), or Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP)). This is useful as it is able to detect if an unwanted protocol is attempting to bypass the firewall on an allowed port or detect if a protocol is being abused in any harmful way.

Next Generation FirewallPat Calhoun, SVP at McAfee, explained in a Help Net Info article that it was not until 2009 when the fourth generation firewall we know and love began to evolve. In 2009 Gartner published its definition and a paper on “Defining the Next-Generation Firewall. (PDF)” According to its definition, NGFWs are:

…deep-packet inspection firewalls that move beyond port/protocol inspection and blocking to add application-level inspection, intrusion prevention, and bringing intelligence from outside the firewall.

In its paper, the Gartner authors explain that “Firewalls need to evolve to be more proactive in blocking new threats, such as botnets and targeted attacks.” Mcafee’s Calhoun points out that NGFW discussions started in 2003 but the technology really didn’t get on the right track until Gartner defined it in 2009.

 

Intel 25th Anniversary of the Firewall infographic

rb-

Future NGFW development efforts need to integrate application control, IPS, and evasion prevention into a single, purpose-built box with enterprise-scale availability and manageability solution.

Back in the day, 2000, I managed a Checkpoint firewall IPSO ver 3.0 on a Nokia appliance (IP300?). The thing was the network had been up and running for 3 years and included over 3,000 devices before the Checkpoint was put in. Can’t get away with that now,  a naked PC on the Innertubes will be compromised within minutes to hours, according to those who know that kind of stuff. 

The most vivid recollection of setting the thing up was just randomly mashing on the keys to create the first key. Other network guys were amazed because apparently, this was the first firewall many had seen with a GUI to configure the rules.

I also remember learning the hard way that Deny All goes at the bottom of the list, not the top. 

Related articles
  • Enterprise Firewall Market: Global Forecast to 2019 by Professional Services (mynewsdesk.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Patent Wars Are Pointless

Patent Wars Are PointlessThe Business Insider has new data about the value of the patent wars. BI cites Florian Mueller, the founder of the FOSS Patents blog. He says patent litigation is a waste of resources. His research found that the patent wars cost companies millions of dollars in time and lawyer fees. Mr. Mueller analyzed 222 Android smartphone patent assertions. He found that 90% of those cases have gone absolutely nowhere.

Patent trollAccording to BI Intelligence, Mr. Mueller’s data says that 49% of the assertions have failed thus far. Another 42% of assertions were dropped without a comprehensive settlement or a “comparably negative fate.” It turns out that only 9% of the patent assertions were able to establish liability. Even in that small sample, only 50% of those cases resulted in “lasting injunctive relief.” Mr. Mueller says that number would be even smaller if “the patents underlying Nokia’s German injunctions against HTC (2498) had come to judgment in the Federal Patent Court.”

Business Insier chart

In other words, based on patent cases brought to court by Apple (AAPL), Google (GOOG), Samsung (005930), Microsoft (MSFT), Nokia (NOK), Motorola (MSI), and a host of others, litigation is, more often than not, a serious waste of time and money for all parties involved.

 rb-

Back in 2012 Boston University estimated that patent shenanigans have cost the US economy $29 Billion annually, now there is evidence it is a total waste of time and money and only funds the lawyers.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Cloud Storage, Back-Up Bust

Cloud Storage, Back-Up BustIt is heady times fans of cloud storage these days. In case you haven’t been paying attention, the cloud file storage corner of the IT universe has heated up for the past couple of months. Dropbox, Microsoft (MSFT), Google (GOOG) and Apple (AAPL) have been leapfrogging each other in an apparent effort to buy mind-share.

Dropbox recently announced that its Dropbox Pro plan will now offer 1TB of capacity for $9.99 a month, or $99 for a full-year subscription. Paul Mah at FierceCIO says this is a significant reduction, especially when recent monthly Dropbox Pro storage prices were:

  • Dropbox logo$9.99 for 100GB,
  • $19.99 for 200GB, and
  • $49.99 for 500GB of storage.

Mr. Mah, says the latest move by Dropbox allows them to stay on par with the latest price cuts from Apple iCloud in September, Google Drive in June, and Microsoft OneDrive in May.

In September Apple updated its porous iCloud storage plans. CNET says the basic 5 gigabytes of storage remains free, though prices for paid tiers were significantly reduced and larger storage options were made available. CNET says the new monthly iCloud storage costs are:

  • Free for 5GB,
  • $0.99 for 20GB,
  • $3.99 for 200GB,
  • $9.99 for 500GB and
  • $19.99 1TB

Previously, 10GB of storage would have cost $20 per year, 20GB for $40 per year, and 50GB for $100 per year.

At Microsoft, the cloud-based file storage game also changed. According to Redmond Magazine, the improvements include a new file load limit (10GB max), an easier way to share links to OneDrive folders, and support for folder drag-and-drop operations using the Google Chrome browser. Microsoft is also working on speeding up the synchronization of files with OneDrive. The updated per month prices for OneDrive are:

  • Microsoft One DriveFree for 15GB,
  • $1.99 for 100GB,
  • $3.99 for 200GB,
  • $5.99 1TB

In an attempt to trump MSFT, Google released Google Drive for Work, a paid service targeted at business users and priced at $10 per user per month. FierceCIO noted that the new service offers unlimited storage, the ability to upload files of up to 5TB in size, and access to productivity apps such as Docs, Sheets, Slides, Hangouts, and Sites. Importantly, Google also announced that files uploaded to Google Drive can be encrypted, and will stay that way while in transit or when at rest on its servers. Here are the current prices per month for Google Drive space pace according to CNET:

  • Google DriveFree for 15GB,
  • $1.99 for 100GB,
  • $9.99 for 1TB,
  • $99.99 10TB,
  • $199.99 for 20TB and
  • $299.99 for 30TB.

Mr. Mah argues that price drops are good news for consumers. The extra space would certainly be useful for users who rely on it for long-term file archives or backing up large local files. The author correctly argues that 1TB of online storage does not deliver the same value to business users. The reason is simple: cloud storage is a terrible backup solution for large volumes of data, especially if you need to get it back quickly.

Mr, Mah observed that cloud storage vendors do not share information about any guaranteed uploading or downloading speeds when using them. This is noteworthy considering that 1TB of files can take a really long time to transfer over the Internet.

He explains that downloading 1TB worth of files with zero data overhead–which is impossible, across a reasonable 10Mbps broadband connection would take over 222 hours, or close to 10 days of continuous downloading. You can be assured that real-life conditions on your broadband connection would likely mean that this is at least doubled or even tripled.

And that’s assuming that the cloud service provider isn’t experiencing any congestion on its end, which is not something that cloud vendors are offering any guarantees on. Notwithstanding that, you can check out this nifty online calculator.

So while there is no question about the value of cloud storage for data synchronization across multiple devices, it is important for businesses to understand that the cloud just isn’t ideal for data backup. Mr. Mah concludes that users should use their 1TB of cloud space for all its worth, but users and firms need to do proper local backups for important files, as well as those that need to be restored quickly.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.