Tag Archive for Net neutrality

Detroit One of Worst Connected US Cities

Detroit One of Worst Connected US CitiesThe outgoing Michigan goobernerd has finally noticed a broadband access problem in Michigan. The Detroit News is reporting that Snyder announced a plan to make universal access to high-speed internet available throughout Michigan. (rb- Just like safe drinking water in Flint?) Snyder’s office says the Michigan Consortium of Advanced Networks (MCAN) sets the path for improving access and adoption of broadband.

Synder’s minions say that Michigan currently ranks 30th in the nation for broadband availability. More than 350,000 households – mostly in rural areas – lack access to high-speed internet service. Another two million households only have access to a single, terrestrial internet service provider.

Their meaningless election year recommendations include calling for greater investment in broadband to improve the community and economic development. They are also promoting and building awareness for low-cost broadband subscription programs.

Among the groups involved in this election year boondoggle is a who’s who of soft-money PAC contributing network neutrality haters:

As proof these groups have failed to make broadband available to the citizens of Detroit, CircleiD.com points us to the National Digital Inclusion Alliance (NDIA) report. The NDIA found that Detroit is the second-worst connected city in the U.S. NDIA ranked all 185 U.S. cities with 50,000 households by the total percentage of each city’s households lacking fixed broadband internet subscriptions.

Slow internetThe study used data from the 2016 American Community Survey (ACS), released by the U.S. Census Bureau. NDIA notes, “The term ‘Fixed broadband Internet’ as used by the Census includes wireline broadband technologies (cable Internet, DSL, fiber to the premises) as well as satellite and ‘fixed wireless’ technologies … It does not include 3G and 4G mobile services such as one purchases for a smartphone, or non-broadband connections like dial-up modems.

NDIA says this data is not an indication of the availability of home broadband service, but rather of the extent to which households are actually connected to it. NDIA focused on fixed broadband subscriptions in this comparison of household connection rates, because the strict data caps common to mobile Internet services make mobile much less useful for general household Internet access.

Internet slow laneOther Michigan communities in the study included Warren which ranked 86th nationally with 56.7% of households disconnected and Grand Rapids which came in at 107 nationally with 29.4% of its households off the net.

Worst Connected Cities

City, StateWorst-Connected RankTotal householdsNumber of households without fixed broadbandPercent of households without fixed broadband
Brownsville, Texas150,28933,71167.0%
Detroit, Michigan2259,295147,06756.7%
Hialeah, Florida375,22242,25856.2%
Shreveport, Louisiana475,50938,20050.6%
Memphis, Tennessee5256,973126,42849.2%
Cleveland, Ohio6168,30681,75748.6%
Laredo, Texas769,84933,07747.4%
Miami, Florida8172,74881,42447.1%
Jackson, Mississippi964,92930,35146.7%
Topeka, Kansas1051,47123,77546.2%
Newark, New Jersey1199,57645,89646.1%
Syracuse, New York1256,29525,57145.4%
Mobile, Alabama1379,18835,90645.3%
Chattanooga, Tennessee1472,34932,07344.3%
Dayton, Ohio1558,72225,98844.3%
Birmingham, Alabama1690,11739,70744.1%
Springfield, Missouri1774,12632,49943.8%
Akron, Ohio1883,07135,73643.0%
Rochester, New York1984,68836,36442.9%

rb-

Slow internetI get so irritated by these political games. Followers of the Bach Seat know that I have been involved with projects that have provided real high-speed Internet access to some of the poorest communities in Michigan. That is despite the efforts of many of these same players.

Am I the only grumpy guy that remembers of other doomed efforts? Link Michigan? Wireless Genesee? Wireless Oakland?

Election year politics.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Hey Lobbying Tech Spender

-Update 04-26-2016- As if to prove my point, Democratic Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders just named Verizon one of America’s Top Ten Tax Avoiders. VZ has a corporate tax rate of -2% for the last 6 years according to the post. Verizon has the #4 lobbying spender.

Hey Lobbying Tech SpenderJust in time for the U.S. tax deadline, the Business Insider has a report which details the amount of money the tech titans spent on bribing lobbying the politicians in DC. Thanks to one of the small bits of transparency in the gooberment, the U.S. House of Representatives requires companies to file government lobbying records. You can search their disclosures here at the Office of the Clerk of the House. (rb- Use this while you can, it’s likely to be shut down at any time by politicians with things to hide.)

Amazon was the most aggressive tech lobbyist in 2015The most aggressive tech spender on lobbying in 2015 was Amazon (AMZN) according to research by Consumer Watchdog. The company spent $9.07 million (a company record) on lobbying in 2015, an incredible 91.4% surge from its 2014 spend dedicated to influencing federal regulations last year according to BI.

Amazon lobbied Washington about

tech firms spent over $122M lobbying Washington politiciansDespite Amazon’s aggressive lobbying, Google (GOOG) topped the list of tech companies for the second year in a row. Google spent $16.6 million in 2015 vs $16.83 million in 2014. The biggest spending tech firms spent over $122M lobbying Washington politicians.

How the tech titans spent their money

  1. Google: $16.6 million in 2015 vs $16.83M in 2014.
  2. Comcast (CMCSA): $15.63 million vs $16.8M in 2014
  3. AT&T (T): $14.86 million, up from $14.56M in 2014
  4. Verizon (VZ): $11.43 million, up 1.9% from $11.22M in 2014.
  5. Facebook (FB): $9.85 million from $9.34M in 2014, a company record.
  6. Amazon (AMZB): $9.07 million up 91.4% from 2014 .
  7. Microsoft (MSFT): $8.49 million vs $8.33M in 2014.
  8. Time Warner Cable (TWC): $6.8 million in 2015, down 13.2% from 2014.
  9. T-Mobile (TMUS) $6.14 million, up 1.7% from 2014.
  10. Apple (AAPL): $4.48 million in 2015 compared to $4.11M in 2014.
  11. IBM (IBM): $4.63 million, a 6.5% decrease from $4.9M in 2014.
  12. Intel (INTC): $4.55 million in 2015, up 19.7% from $3.80M in 2014.
  13. Oracle (ORCL): $4.46 million in 2015, down 23.5% from $5.83M in 2014.
  14. Cisco (CSCO): $2.69 million compared to $2.35M in 2014.
  15. Yahoo (YHOO): $2.84 million in 2015 vs $2.94M in 2014.

Tech titans with boxes of meney for politicansBI reminds us that these may seem like big numbers, they’re a tiny part of these companies’ overall expenditures — in the third quarter of 2015, Google spent $3.47 billion on traffic acquisition costs (such as the price of its deal to stay the default search on Apple’s iPhone), and another $6.93 billion on other operating expenses.

rb-

I haven’t written about the tech’s industry lobbying efforts since 2010. Many of the names have remained the same, ATT, Verizon, Google, IBM, Yahoo, and Intel have been bribing lobbying the gooberment for a very long time.

However, just 5 years ago, Apple and Facebook were barely in the lobbying racket.  In 2015, they both ranked at the top in lobbying spending.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

GOP Ordred to Gut FCC Over Net Neutrality

GOP Ordred to Gut FCC Over Net NeutralityThe courts turned down big Telecom’s demands to immediately kill Net Neutrality and somehow the Internet still works. But big Telecom’s House Republican stooges continue their war against consumers and the open Internet. The telecom lackeys have buried riders in a budget bill that would stop the FCC from enforcing the Net Neutrally regs until courts decide several challenges.

According to FierceCable, the GOP’s 2016 Financial Services and General Government Appropriations bill, unveiled recently, has three riders buried in the budget rules that:

  1. riders buried in the budgetPrevent the FCC from enforcing its net neutrality rules, pending what could be years of litigation.
  2. Cut the FCC budget by $73 million.
  3. Prohibits the FCC from regulating rates for both wireline and wireless Internet services.

Harold Feld, senior VP at Public Knowledge, in a responding statement told FierceCable:

Worst of all, the Appropriations Committee ban on FCC enforcement that ‘directly or indirectly’ regulates prices would prevent the FCC from ban on FCC enforcementperforming even the most basic consumer protection action, such as the recent FCC enforcement against wireless carriers requiring them to refund charges for services customers did not order or had discontinued.

Public Knowledge VP Feld concludes:

The Appropriations Committee would rather declare open season to rob American broadband subscribers with overcharges and ripoffs than allow the FCC to do its job.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

AT&T Already Profits from Net Neutrality

AT&T Already Profits from Net NeutralityIn further proof that no matter what – the huge corporations always win, AT&T (T), one of the most vocal opponents to net neutrality has already started to profit from it. FierceTelecom is reporting that AT&T’s new reclassification under Title II of the Communications Act as part of new net neutrality rules are working in the mega-Bell’s favor.

the huge corporations always winThe article says regulators cited Title II to justify a ruling for AT&T. The FCC ruling said AT&T should be awarded damages for being overcharged by two Michigan-based rural telcos for interstate access services. Now the FCC has to set how much money AT&T should receive from East Lansing-based Great Lakes Comnet (GLC) and Westphalia Telephone Company (WTC). The FCC wrote in its order, “We agree with AT&T.

Initially, AT&T asked for a $12 million refund and wants to avoid paying an extra $4.3 million that Westphalia and Great Lakes claim the telco owes them. The author explains that the FCC argued that AT&T was billed unlawfully because of Section 201(b) of the Communications Act. This is the part of Title II that says: “All charges, practices, classifications, and regulations for and in connection with such communication service, shall be just and reasonable, and any such charge, practice, classification, or regulation that is unjust or unreasonable is declared to be unlawful.

Verizon raised consumer phone rates to fund the broadband network they objected toIronically, during the run-up to the net neutrality decision,  AT&T, Verizon (VZ), Comcast (CMCSA), and other telcos claimed that regulation would hurt their profits, which seems like misinformation BS. The FierceTelecom article reports that the FCC said that it won’t set specific price caps or tell service providers what they can charge for service, consumers can complain to the FCC if their provider is overcharging them for service.

FierceTelecom also points to an Ars Technica report, that Verizon (VZ), another outspoken critic of applying Title II to broadband services, ironically used its common carrier status for POTS services to build its FiOS fiber-to-the-home (FTTH) network. Besides leveraging Title II to get access to utility poles and rights-of-way to string up fiber, Verizon raised consumer phone rates to fund the fiber build.

rb-

This could be written-off as unintended consequences or is it? Is the goobermnet in bed with the Telco’s and all the net neutrality hub-bub was just a show?

Quoting MLive

the leaders making our laws, writing our budgets, and setting the agenda are not widely seen as effective … there’s a serious and alarming lack of leadership …

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Net Neutrality – We Win

Let the lawsuits begin!

Net Neutrality - We Win

In addition to the lawyers, lining up to squash Net Neutrality, Michigan’s own Fred Upton—who holds personal investments in AT&T, Comcast, and Verizon—has introduced anti-Net Neutrality legislation that eliminates the FCC’s authority to regulate internet service providers and could crush the agency’s ruling and allow AT&T (T), Comcast (CMCSA) and Verizon (VZ) to rule the Internet at our cost to grow their profits.

rb-

I have already seen an ad on BrightHouse cable from Broadband For America, (whose membership page is empty) claiming that the FCC ruling will force them to raise taxes. Here come more imaginary “Regulatory re-captureprofits fees.

For right now, this is a rare win for the 99% in post 9-11 ‘murica. Just follow the money.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.