Tag Archive for 2013

Six Steps to Avoid BYOD Pitfalls

Six Steps to Avoid BYOD PitfallsIn a recent article on the Forbes CIO Central blog, Dan Woods interviewed Brian Madocks, CEO of PC Helps, a services firm that provides supplemental help desk services for more than 1.6 million end-users. He has been on the front lines as many of its clients have opened up BYOD.

I want an iPadIn the article, Forbes offers advice on how IT departments can respond to users who show up at work and declare: “I want an iPad.”  The author warns that ignoring the corporate use of personal devices (smartphones, iPad’s and other tablets) leave both end-users and the IT department quite unhappy.

Mr. Madocks says the biggest myth is that allowing personal devices to be used for work-related purposes reduces the support burden. At first, this seems strange. If people use devices they know well, shouldn’t they need less help? Also, if an employee is using an iPhone or iPad, won’t their support questions be handled by AppleCare, Apple’s support arm? Mr. Madocks says no. Consumerization reduces some types of support but generates others. Here’s what happens.

ConsumerizationThe number of calls about how to use the device may go down. People know how to use their phones, get on the Internet, and use Facebook. But the number of calls about how to get their corporate email, calendar, and contacts working on phones or tablets may go up. With Apple (AAPL) iPhones and iPads and the fragmented Google (GOOG) Android versions out there it’s even more complicated. The PC Helps CEO reports that users can be frustrated when they go to Apple’s Genius Bar, AppleCare, or to Google for Andriod support and find out that they won’t get any help there because the staff doesn’t know how to support your corporate environment or the applications used within it.

With a multitude of personal devices in your workforce, the support burden may increase and your help desk may not be able to keep up with the unique features and aspects of all the devices. Mr. Madocks concludes that no matter how you allow access to the corporate resources the support burden NEVER disappears.

The support experts from the PC Helps brain-trust, developed a playbook for organizations considering a Bring Your Own Device model:

Don’t just say no to “bring your own technology”: The cat is out of the bag. End users are more productive when they have a vote on the tools they use and their support. PC Helps suggests IT show some leadership and help figure out how to get BYOD (PDF) right so that the company is protected and the users are happy. Recognize that consumerization means giving up some control; learn to live with that.

Listen to the end-users: Create an internal customer advisory group to allow end-users to explain what they want and what they don’t. The article says one of the primary drivers of consumerization is the wish to have work and personal content and capabilities on a single device. Craft a draft set of policies and guidelines based on this input.

Help deskResearch and test your approach: Consider a pilot program before full rollout that includes a mix of key users. Discover the range and types of preferred devices as well as the corporate systems, networks, and applications users will need access to. The blog recommends that you incorporate your findings into the broader rollout plan.

Document and communicate a clear set of policies and guidelines for end-users: Everyone should know what the company policies are for personal devices and where to find them. Explicit review of policies and testing for understanding should be performed from time to time, or as new devices arrive and raise new issues. The policies should set forth:

  • Which devices will be supported.
  • How to request new/more devices,
  • Which apps are authorized,
  • Which apps are forbidden,
  • How to get approval for new apps,
  • What company data is allowed on personal devices,
  • How to get support for devices and applications.

The policies should also answer the following questions:

  • When a device is no longer used for work or an employee leaves, what are their responsibilities to securely deletion corporate data?
  • Where and how will devices be backed up?
  • Who is responsible for backup?
  • Are lock and password-protection required, and how is it managed?
  • Who will provide support?
  • What kind of support questions should be directed to device manufacturers?

ComplexityPlan for a more complex support burden: Allowing personal devices means a world with more devices, which in turn multiplies the knowledge needed from the help desk. There will be more questions on setup, remote access, and use of corporate applications, as well as problems unique to the different devices. There will be more complex support scenarios, such as, how to use Microsoft Office applications on non-PC devices. Be sure you have a support plan and trained people in place.

Don’t rely on device manufacturers for support of your end-users: Manufacturers can handle break/fix and warranty support on products, but they won’t know your corporate policies, processes, nor the core office applications your users work with every day. Apple iPad owners have access to AppleCare and Genius bars, but this is all geared to consumers. AppleCare won’t help with many synchronization issues related to accessing corporate email on the iPad, nor provide urgent support for deadline-related business situations.

a risk to IT’s reputationEnd-users may get the run-around, going to the manufacturer and then to their wireless service provider, to your internal help desk, and to peer support for help, wasting time and productivity on something that could be solved in a single call. Devices for corporate use should have corporate support or they will present a risk to IT’s reputation in the organization.

Prepare your help desk for the task: The help desk in a BYOD IT environment is a different type of organization, one that must be able to respond to the unexpected. Mixed device environments require specialization and expertise, as well as ongoing training and skill-building. Your existing help desk staff may need to be retrained, expanded, or supplemented.

In the end, Mr. Madocks reports that the firms PC Helps assists in consumerization don’t regret their decision. “While consumerization creates complexity for support … The company’s workforce is happier and more productive, and the reputation of IT as a supporter of the business is greatly enhanced.” The end result is generally happier users and happier IT, but there are complications.

rb-

It is my experience that most people who push consumer devices into the enterprise, don’t have a plan. They want their iPads, for valid or not so valid reasons. Some staff seemed surprised when they could not print to the enterprise printer on the enterprise network with the iPad they just brought in.

I place a great deal of the blame at the feet of Apple. I have had Apple engineers look me straight in the face and tell me that iPads are consumer devices and not designed for the enterprise and that Apple does not intend to fix it.

They do not use standard protocols and BYOD proponents don’t even know what Bonjour is, let alone the limitations of Bonjour.

http://blogs.forbes.com/ciocentral/2011/02/07/i-want-my-ipad-avoiding-it-consumerization-pitfalls/
Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

802.11ac Wi-Fi Clears the Way for Collaboration

802.11ac Wi-Fi Clears the Way for CollaborationThe emerging gigabit 802.11ac, Wi-Fi standard is the current darling of the hype machine. The standard will be finalized in February 2014. However, that has not stopped manufacturers from shipping 802.11ac routers, access points, and mobile devices. Shortel (SHOR) recently provided their opinion on what this means for your business.

IEEE 802.11acThe article points out that more people are using mobile apps and devices. Shortel calculates that a typical worker may have three IP addresses, while digital natives may have up to six IP addresses. These stats suggest that mobility has become a must-have and the author claims that 802.11ac can meet the needs of increasing mobility because 802.11ac is faster, more reliable, and delivers more Wi-Fi capacity. 802.11ac is:

  • Faster – 802.11ac is three times faster than 802.11n Wi-Fi. 802.11ac will deliver up to 1.3 Gbps, which is about three times faster than 802.11n. This capacity will be ideal for real-time applications, such as IP voice and streaming video. Faster data throughput means better battery life for mobile devices, too.
  • More reliable – 802.11ac is more reliable with less interference. 802.11ac operates at 5 GHz, which is far less crowded than the 2.4 GHz band that by 802.11b/g/n access points — as well as cordless phones, automatic garage door openers, and other home appliances. That means that there’s less interference from other Wi-Fi-enabled devices, which will result in a better user experience.
  • Improved throughput. 802.11ac uses multiple antennas for transmitting and receiving RF signals, and that means better data throughput. More specifically, MIMO, or Multiple-Input and Multiple-Output, is key to providing wireless performance that is more switch-like, compared to the shared media nature of 802.11n.

W-Fi Alliance logoShortel believes that Gigabit Wi-Fi can be a real asset for unified communications, streaming media, and other bandwidth-hungry apps. They plan to use the greater capacity of 802.11ac to support more devices and more apps. In the workplace, teams want to engage and share without hassle using modern collaboration tools with the devices of their choice creating the need for BYOD.

The newest generation of workers are digital natives, who are more inclined to use videoconferencing for quick chats or to share ideas. In addition, many people use tablets to stream media, and more organizations are turning to streaming media over Wi-Fi for digital signage, training, company meetings, and customer support. And those bandwidth-hungry applications will love the new gigabit Wi-Fi.

Wave 1 802.11ac only offers incremental benefits over 802.11nShoretel reassures those that have deployed an 802.11n WLAN recently, you don’t need to be in a hurry to move to 802.11ac. You can be confident in the investment that you made, as the first-generation 802.11ac will offer only incremental benefits over 802.11n. But if you are replacing old Wi-Fi or expanding your wireless LAN or looking to downsize your wired network in favor of wireless, you should weigh the options between 802.11n and the new 802.11ac.

rb-

802.11ac will only get faster, the theoretical max speed of 802.11ac is just shy of 7Gbps, which you will never see in the wild, but don’t be surprised to see link speeds of 2Gbps or more in the next few years. At 2Gbps, you’ll get a transfer rate of 256MB/sec.

To reach such Wi-Fi speeds, chipset and device makers will have to figure out how to make second-generation chipsets with four or more 802.11ac streams in software and hardware. The engineers at Broadcom (BRCM), Qualcomm (QCOM), Marvell (MRVL), and Intel (INTC) are already working on ways to implementing four and eight-stream 802.11ac solutions. A lot of work will need to be done by the chipset and device makers to make sure that advanced features, such as beamforming, comply with the standard and are interoperable with other 802.11ac devices.

In general, then, you can certainly expect some impressive speeds from 802.11ac in situations where you don’t need the performance and reliability of wired GigE. But I do not believe that 802.11ac will replace a wired Gigabit Ethernet network just yet.

What do you think?

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Ford Studies Space Bots for Better Cars

IFord Studies Space Bots for Better Carsn its efforts to build a better, connected carFord (F) is doing research in a rather odd place the International Space Station. at GigaOM is reporting that the Dearborn, Michigan-based automaker is entering into a three-year project with St. Petersburg Polytechnic University to study how space-based research and exploration robots communicate through telematics networks.

Ford logoWhat do space robots have to do with cars? The article explains that the next generation of space-based robots will be some of the most hyper-connected machines in the universe, relying on multiple radio technologies to communicate with the space station, the astronauts they’re meant to help, and human controllers back on Earth. Though robots will be able to act with some autonomy, they’ll constantly be coordinating with computers and maybe even other robots.

Ford believes that the future connected car will function much the same way, acting semi-autonomously while coordinating its activities with cloud traffic management systems as well as the highway infrastructure and vehicles around them. Just as robots use multiple radio technologies to keep up those different “tethers” to mission control, future cars will come outfitted with multiple network links, from LTE to dedicated short-range communications (DSRC) to Wi-Fi mesh.

Robonaut 2What Ford is particularly interested in are the redundancies that St. Petersburg Polytechnic is developing for its robot telematics networks. As you can imagine, having your control link to a robot cut isn’t something any astronaut wants to deal with — in the hazardous environment of space or in the limited confines of a space station, retrieving your suddenly unresponsive robot is a lot harder than it sounds.

But that broken control link could then be routed over different networks. They could use a wireless local area network intended for internet access, or a direct radio link to another robot. The guy with the joystick in his hand may have to take a more circuitous route to communicate with his metallic friend, but he’ll still be able to communicate.

DLR Justin humanoid robotThe blog says that the same principle applies to the connected car. As cars become more intelligent and autonomous, they’ll depend on an array of sensors and network connections to feed them information. Cars will form vast constantly shifting ad hoc networks, transmitting information to one another about their acceleration, braking, lane changes, and even eventual destinations, which in turn will allow them to coordinate their driving. Vehicles will also communicate with highway infrastructure around them and connect to the internet through cellular connections. According to Ford technical leader in systems analytics Oleg Gusikhin:

“We are analyzing the data to research which networks are the most robust and reliable for certain types of messages, as well as fallback options if networks were to fail in a particular scenario. In a crash, for example, a vehicle could have the option to communicate an emergency though a DSRC, LTE or a mesh network based on the type of signal, speed and robustness required to reach emergency responders as quickly as possible.”

Though Ford’s initial focus is on using telematics redundancy to route emergency communications, GigaOM concludes that it is it’s easy to see how these multi-node networks could be used in other scenarios.

SateliteMr. Fitchard argues that If the vehicle-to-vehicle radios in your car were to suddenly go down, chances are you’d want to take direct control of the wheel, but that doesn’t mean your car has to go off-grid. Other radios could communicate with the vehicle-to-infrastructure network or even the cloud through a cellular connection, which could then pass on your car’s sensor data to other vehicles around you. Those other vehicles could in turn use the same channels to pass key information back to your car, for instance, warning you of accidents or traffic jams ahead.

If vehicles were able to securely share their connections, we could always communicate with the internet and critical transportation systems by the most efficient – and often cheapest — means possible. So say instead of streaming high-quality audio over an expensive LTE connection, cars could use their vehicular mesh to pass the stream along from a highway access point car to car until it reached your dashboard.

Ford’s project with St. Petersburg Polytechnic will focus on multiple robots, including the General Motors (GM) – NASA-designed Robonaut 2, which is already aboard the ISS; the European Space Agency’s Eurobot Ground Prototype, a robotic assistant designed to aid astronauts on a planet’s surface, and Justin, a humanoid robot designed by Germany’s DLR for fine-grained manipulation of objects

rb-

I covered GM’s Robonaut earlier as well as connected cars, here and here.

Related article
  • Ford pioneering the use of robotic test drivers (kbb.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

NVIDIA Comes to Detroit

NVIDIA Comes to DetroitAutomakers have made a beeline for Central California in recent years. They are setting up research and engineering facilities in the shadows of consumer electronics giants Google (GOOG) and Apple (AAPL). The Detroit Bureau asks if the migration be turning around? A major Silicon Valley firm, NVIDIA (NVDA), is reversing the trend by setting up a technical center in Ann Arbor.

NVIDIA technical center in Ann ArborAnnArbor.com reports the tech center will initially support about 20 employees. They will be primarily dedicated to working with the local automotive community. Danny Shapiro, director of automotive for Santa Clara, CA, based NVIDIA said that more work will likely be done at the center with supercomputing and graphics development. NVIDIA VP for worldwide automotive sales and Ann Arbor site leader Phil Hughes said. “We’re going to have software engineers, hardware engineers and field application engineers working here as well as people on the business and marketing side.” 

Who uses NVIDIA

Mr. Shapiro said the new facility will help the company’s growing team of Michigan-based engineers and executives work with automakers and suppliers. The Michigan team will develop the next generation of infotainment, navigation, and driver assistance programs. NVIDIA points out that Chrysler, Ford (F), General Motors (GM), and Volkswagen are already using NVIDIA products in their designs. NVIDIA believes having a technology center near the heart of the auto manufacturing community in Michigan makes sense.

Detroit automakersSilicon Valley is the future, Detroit is the past,” said NVIDIA’s Shapiro. “That’s the conventional wisdom. Well, the conventional wisdom isn’t quite right. We’ve been investing in Michigan for years and we’re accelerating these efforts by opening the Nvidia Technology Center.

Detroit Bureau points out that NVIDIA isn’t alone. Other high-tech firms opening centers in Southeast Michigan are Microsoft (MSFT) and Google, Mr. Shapiro noted. “This is where consumer electronics and safety advancements are being made that will change the driving experience for all of us,” the executive told the Detroit Bureau. “Nvidia has been fueling this trend for years. A number of our employees live in the area and are working closely with car companies.

High-tech start-ups

DetroitWhile there’s a small but growing presence of high-tech start-ups within the Motor City itself, many of the firms setting up shop in Michigan have chosen to go to Ann Arbor the home of the University of Michigan. “All of this activity has helped make Ann Arbor a high-tech hub and not just for the Detroit area,” Shapiro noted.

Michael Finney, president of the Michigan Economic Development Corp., said Nvidia already powers in-dash instrument clusters as well as navigation and information displays in more than 4 million vehicles from automakers such as Audi, Bentley, BMW, Lamborghini, Maserati, Rolls Royce, Tesla, and Volkswagen.

rb-

I have covered the new blood moving into the neighborhood, including SAIC, and Bill Ford’s plans to make Detroit the Silicon Valley of Mobility.

Related article

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

From Madison to PRISM

From Madison to PRISMThe folks at Whocalledmyphone.net have given us this excellent infographic. It traces the battle between the right to privacy and the prying eyes of the government. The infographic follows the erosion of privacy from the Bill of Rights to Prism. For more details, you can also check out the EFF page Timeline of NSA Domestic Spying.

Privacy vs. Security infographic
Image compliments of Who Called My Phone

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.