Tag Archive for CSCO

Facebook Challenges Cisco

Facebook Challenges CiscoJulie Bort at the BusinessInsider says Facebook is challenging the stagnate network giant Cisco (CSCO). Facebook’s (FBNajam Ahmad, leader of the OCP networking project announced a product that should have Cisco shaking in its boots. Mr. Ahmad told the New York Times, “The bigger strategy here is to get computer networking out of the black box, black operations part of the world.

Facebook logoFacebook introduced the new top-of-rack Wedge switch in 2013. The Wedge release made good FB’s promise to disrupt the $23 billion Ethernet switch market, now dominated by Cisco. Wedge is part of the Open Compute Project (OCP). The author says is OCP one of the most important tech projects Facebook has ever created. OCP began in 2012 as a radically new way to build and buy computer hardware. It creates free and “open source” designs where anyone can contribute to the designs and use them for free.

Open Compute Project

The hardware OCP designs range from computer servers to hard drives to the racks that hold them all. While Facebook still leads the project, it has grown into an industry phenom. In 2013, the article says Facebook saved “over $1 billion” by using the hardware invented by Facebook.

Cisco logoAnd a year ago, OCP announced plans to build a network switch. And not just any network switch, but one designed as a software-defined networking (SDN) device. BI explains that SDN is a new way to build networks that threaten Cisco, or at least Cisco’s 60+% profit margins. SDN takes the fancy features baked into network equipment – things like security, management – and puts them into the software. This turns the hardware into something that dumbly moves bits of information around. The hardware switch becomes easier to move around and manage, and far less expensive, all things that cloud computing does better.

Software-defined networking

Cisco has already recently released its own SDN product line Cisco Open Network Environment (ONE). Ms. Bort (and others) contend these products encourage customers to keep buying Cisco’s high-performance but expensive gear by including features that will only work with said Cisco’s products. No doubt many enterprises will want that. But Facebook’s switch is a threat for a lot of reasons.

  • Facebook is already testing it in its own data centers, one of the most demanding environments around, it said.
  • Wedge is “open source.” Cisco gear is somewhat like Apple’s (AAPL) gear. Cisco controls and keeps secret every part of it from the operating system to the custom processors.

Open Compute ProjectThe Wedge is different. Everything from the software to the choice of processor Intel (INTC), AMD (AMD), or ARM (ARMH), is “open source” meaning others can see and use or modify the design. As Facebook’s Yuval Bachar and Adam Simpkins explain in a Facebook post about the Wedge switch:

Traditional network switches often use fixed hardware configurations and non-standard control interfaces, limiting the capabilities of the device and complicating deployments. … Unlike with traditional closed-hardware switches, with “Wedge” anyone can modify or replace any of the components in our design to better meet their needs.

Facebook Wedge Switch

Standard parts

EnterpriseTech explains the Wedge switch was built using standard parts. It uses Broadcom’s (BRCM) popular Trident-II switch ASIC, which can provide sixteen 40 Gb/sec ports, which could easily be expanded to 32 ports. The ports can also be equipped with splitter cables, breaking them down into 10 Gb/sec ports that would boost the effective port count to 64 ports in a 1U enclosure. The Wedge switch has a compute element, which is a microserver based on an unspecified Intel processor (most likely an eight-core “Avoton” C2000 processor) that adheres to Facebook’s “Group Hug” microserver specification. Finally, the Wedge switch uses a Facebook homegrown version of Linux.

OCP has already attracted some big players beyond Facebook, too, including Microsoft (MSFT), Intel, Goldman Sachs, Rackspace (RAX), Bloomberg, and many others. It’s worth noting that enterprises cannot buy this switch from Facebook. They would have to order it from a custom manufacturer, just like all other OCP designs. But if this switch does well for Facebook, enterprises will be encouraged to try SDN. And up-and-coming competitors to Cisco, like Arista and Big Switch are involved in OCP and are standing by to cash in.

rb-

Facebook is not alone. Google (GOOG) and Amazon (AMZN) have done the same thing after being frustrated by the slow pace at which incumbent tech companies move. By comparison, the Asian contractor manufacturers that Facebook has used for its open hardware have moved disarmingly quickly, according to Facebook’s Ahmad.

Is this an industry inflection point? There is a school of thought out there that believes we are. They compare today’s networking environment to the phone era when Lucent and Nortel were at their peak and failed in the face of the newfangled softswitch. The Cisco Smartnet annual fee on top of any hardware you buy from them sounds exactly like the kinds of pricing practice those who remember, saw in the voice industry when it was a duopoly of Nortel and Lucent.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Rockstars Team Up Against Google

Rockstars Team Up Against GoogleTo usurp Mark Twain, the reports of Nortel‘s demise are greatly exaggerated. GigaOm reports that the defunct Canadian telco giant has found an afterlife as part of a patent trolling operation that struck Android phone makers and is now targeting network and cable operators, including Google, with lawsuits in Texas and Delaware.

afterlife of a patent trolling operationJeff John Roberts writes that Nortel’s second act as the walking dead is taking place thanks to “Rockstar Consortium,” a group formed by Microsoft (MSFT), Apple (AAPL), Blackberry (BBRY), Sony (SNE), Ericsson AB (ERIC)EMC (EMC) and other Google (GOOG) rivals, which bought bankrupt Nortel’s patent portfolio in 2011 for $4.5 billion. (rb- I covered the sale of Nortel’s IP here)

Nortel was the source of many of the most important innovations in history in the field of telecommunications and networking,” says a new Rockstar lawsuit filed in the seemingly pro-troll U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas that accuses Time Warner Cable (TWC) of violating six patents, including US Patent 6128649, which was issued in the year 2000 and describes a method to show multiple screens in a video conference the article summarizes.

Rockstar Consortium formed by Microsoft, Apple, Blackberry, Sony, Ericsson, EMC

The complaint doesn’t say how exactly Time Warner Cable is infringing the old Nortel patents, but only notes that “TWC operates, sells and offers to sell video, high-speed data and voice services over its broadband cable systems throughout the United States.” The author says Rockstar, which is suing through a subsidiary called Constellation, also complains that the cable company walked away from its licensing demands in 2012.

GigaOm notes a second lawsuit, filed in Delaware by Rockstar under the alias “Bockstar” makes a series of broad-based allegations against Cisco (CSCO) that claim the company is violating six other old Nortel patents, including this one from 1998, related to routers and switches.

costs are passed on to customersLike all patent trolling, the author says that has nothing to do with innovation, but it certainly will lead to higher cable bills as Time Warner will have to spend millions on lawyers to fight the suit or else pay expensive license fees for old patents from a dead company; either way, the costs are passed on to customers.

Joe Mullin of Ars Technica noted when Rockstar sued the phone companies, “it’s patent trolling gone corporate.” And there’s no sign of where this will stop. Apple and Microsoft are sitting on thousands of patents that date from an era when the Patent Office would grant a patent on nearly anything, and it looks like they’re going to use them to sue every industry they can think of.

dysfunctional US CongressThe totally dysfunctional US Congress tried to take on patent trolling but caved into lobbyists. Microsoft has already succeeded in stripping out a part of the law that would have made it easier to challenge bad patents. This means the best hope for a return to patent sanity may lie with the Supreme Court, which agreed to consider what type of software patents should be granted in the first place.

GigaOm cites CBC reports that Ottawa, Nortel’s hometown has been transformed from a one-time innovation hotbed into a tech necropolis where once-proud engineers are paid to pick apart other people’s inventions in search of new patent violations that they can pass on their American masters.

 rb-

I have covered the patent trolling mayhem in the mobile market for a while and this seems to be more of the same. Innovation is dead in the mobile market and the only way these firms can compete is in the courthouse.

In addition to their choice of venue in the pro-troll Texas court, further evidence that Microsoft and Apple have created a patent troll can be found in the fact that Rockstar has filed suit against the leading Android phone producers:

  1. Samsung Electronics Co. (005930) (#1 Android OEM in U.S. sales),
  2. LG Electronics (LGLD) (#2),
  3. ZTE (763) (#4),
  4. Huawei (002502) (#6) and
  5. HTC (2498) (#7).

In addition, DailyTech notes that Rockstar member Sony is a minor Android OEM.  If somehow Microsoft and Apple are able to troll other Android OEMs to death, Sony could see gains in market share, as the only OEM who doesn’t have to pay direct licensing fees to Microsoft/Apple (Sony also notably has preexisting licensing deals with Microsoft and Apple).

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

6LoWPAN ?

6LoWPAN ?BYOD, BYON, IoT, IPv6, SaaS, SDN, MDM, M2M, TCP/IP, IEEE, EIEIO, IMHO, tech is drowning in drowning in acronyms. And now Stacey Higginbotham at GigaOM explains 6LoWPAN.  6LoWPAN stands for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks. 6LoWPAN is the lightweight version of traditional internet protocol (IP) designed for the internet of things.

Misco reports that Internet-connected devices will number 9.6 billion by the end of 2013 and the figure will jump to 28 billion by 2020. Currently, the 9.6 billion Internet-connected devices connect to another device, a phone, or a corporate gateway. In order for a true internet of things to emerge, these devices should have the ability to connect directly to a web service.

Device to cloud

IPv6Instead of device-to-device, it’s device to cloud. The article surmises that since most of today’s devices use IP to connect to the web, engineers would like to use IP to connect devices to the web as well. The only problem is that IP is a heavy, energy-intensive beast. This is one that reason, the Internet’s standard’s setting organization, the IETF, proposed 6LoWPAN in 2004.

The numeral 6 in the standard, is short for IPv6. Ms.Higginbotham explains that if you’re envisioning tens of billions of connected sensors then IPv6 is the way to go. However, supporting the 128-bit numbering system required by IPv6 also takes computing and memory overhead that tiny sensors don’t have. It also requires longer packet headers and such that can clog low bit-rate networks. Since the 6 is IPv6 and the Lo references the low-power aspect of the protocol.

Internet of ThingaThe WPAN or Wireless Personal Area Network is a nod to the wireless mesh network that the protocol supports. Because this isn’t directly analogous to the traditional network stacks, it’s hard to limit the technology to a particular layer in the network.

Sensors in a connected network can run the gamut from a video camera that’s plugged into a wall to a battery-powered water sensor hiding under the washing machine. GigaOM says the standard is flexible enough that some nodes might be able to do more than just send information. Others can be designed to sleep until an event wakes them for a data transmission. In short, it’s complicated, which makes defining a network stack or standards for the internet of things tough.

6LoWPAN will use multiple radio protocols

WirelessThe WPAN in 6LoWPAN will use multiple radio protocols. It can work over several radio networks that use the IEEE 802.15.4 standard, the most popular being ZigBee. The IETF is also working with the Bluetooth Special Interest Group to build 6LoWPAN support for the Bluetooth protocol.

GigaOM notes that the Bluetooth SIG already has taken steps to cut power consumption to meet the demands of the internet of things, so it clearly is also aware of the need for the IPv6 addressing scheme if every bra, door lock, or porta-potty is going to hop on the InterTubes without a phone or computer.

ZigBeeCharles McLellan at ZDNet explains that IBM (IBM) has teamed up with wireless sensor network specialist Libelium to deliver a wireless sensor platform starter kit comprising IBM’s Mote Runner SDK and Libelium’s Waspmote sensor platform, Waspmote Mote Runner development platform allows researchers to explore the benefits of 6LoWPAN.

Tech titans betting on 6LoWPAN

Ms. Higginbotham says that IBM getting behind the standard with this announcement is just one more big-name betting on 6LoWPAN as the communications protocol for the internet of things. She says a few months ago ARM purchased Sensinode, a company that has literally written the book (MP4) about 6LoWPAN. Cisco (CSCO) has an investment in 6LoWPAN with its 2010 purchase of Arch Rock, for its smart grid initiative.

Platforms such as Electric Imp, Ayla Networks, and ThingSquare, all of which offer modules and services to connect devices directly to the internet, are also gaining ground with test programs and early adopters, helping make the case for 6LoWPAN. So as devices start going directly to the cloud and bypassing phones and computers, having a protocol that supports modern addressing at relatively low power and low overhead will become more important. And that’s what this terribly awkward acronym provides.

 rb-

6LoWPAN is what will drive the rapid growth of the IoT. The Business Insider says that IoT grows from 1.9 billion devices today, to 9 billion by 2018. To put that in perspective, BI claims that by 2018 IoT will be roughly equal to the number of smartphones, smart TVs, tablets, wearable computers, and PCs combined.

You can insert your own joke about the feds collecting data from a porta-potty.

What do you think? Is 6LoWPAN the best way to connect IoT devices to the cloud?

 

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

A Close Look at 802.11ac Wi-Fi

TA Close Look at 802.11ac Wi-Fiech pundits argue that the new Wi-Fi standard 802.11ac will replace wired gigabit Ethernet networking. 802.11ac is a supercharged version of 802.11n, offering link speeds ranging from 433 Mbps, up to multiple gigabits per second.

Wi-FiTo make 802.11ac dozens of times faster than 802.11n, the new standard works exclusively in the 5GHz band uses a huge chunk of bandwidth (80 or 160MHz), operates in up to eight spatial streams (MIMO), and a technology called beamforming.

At its core, 802.11ac is essentially an updated version of 802.11n, according to Sebastian Anthony the author of an ExtremeTech article “What is 802.11ac WiFi, and how much faster than 802.11n is it?” 802.11n was a huge performance increase over 802.11a and g. 802.11n introduced some key technologies that brought massive speed boosts. Where 802.11n had support for four spatial streams (4×4 MIMO) and a channel width of 40MHz, 802.11ac can use eight spatial streams and has channels up to 80MHz wide, which can be combined to make 160MHz channels. This means that 802.11ac has 8 x 160MHz of spectral bandwidth to play with, versus 4 x 40MHz – a huge difference that allows 802.11ac to send vast amounts of data across the airwaves.

Beamforming

What is new in Wi-Fi

802.11ac also introduces 256-QAM modulation (up from 64-QAM in 802.11n), which sends 256 different signals over the same frequency by shifting each signal to a slightly different phase. In theory, this quadruples the spectral efficiency of 802.11ac over 802.11n. Spectral efficiency is a measure of how well a given wireless protocol/modulation/multiplexing technique uses the bandwidth available to it.

802.11ac also introduces standardized beamforming Matthew Gast, Director of Product Management at AeroHive Networks published an article, “Investing in Beamforming: Is it worth it?” that explains beamforming.

Aerohive logoRather than transmitting a radio signal in all directions, beamforming figures out where the receiver is, and focus the energy towards the receiver. Instead of spraying radio energy all over the place, send packets as a “rifle shot” directly to the receiver’s antenna Mr.Gast explains.

Beamforming is a two-step process: First, figure out how to “aim” the transmission at the receiver, and second, send the transmission. With beamforming, a transmitter is betting that by paying the cost of the channel measurement process, the data transmission that follows will speed up enough to pay off the cost.

802.11n Beamforming was non-standardized, in 802.11ac, there is only one method of beamforming, called the Null Data Packet (NDP). (rb- Read the AeroHive article for a full description of NDP)

Aerohive’s Gast concludes that by steering the energy towards a receiver, beamforming enables you to take a step up to a higher data rate. Mr. Gast estimates that 802.11-based beamforming gives you a 3-5 dB gain.

802.11ac is speedyIn theory, at the 5GHz band with beamforming, 802.11ac should have the same or better range than 802.11n  However, Mr. Anthony says the 5GHz band, has less penetration power so it doesn’t have the same range as 2.4GHz (802.11b/g). The ExtremeTech article concludes that’s an acceptable trade-off: there simply isn’t enough spectral bandwidth in the cluttered 2.4GHz band to allow for 802.11ac’s gigabit-level speeds.

ExtremeTech‘s Anthony calculates there are two answers to how fast is Wi-Fi 802.11ac, the theoretical max speed, and the practical max speed that mere mortals will get surrounded by lots of signal-attenuating obstacles.

He calculates the theoretical max speed of 802.11ac is eight 160MHz 256-QAM channels, each of which is capable of 866.7Mbps – a grand total of 6,933Mbps, or just shy of 7Gbps. That’s a transfer rate of 900 megabytes per second. Compare this with 802.11n’s max theoretical speed, which was 600Mbps. He then says in practice, the current max speed of 802.11ac devices is 1.7Gbps.

ExtremeTech points out there will be a second wave of 802.11ac devices – due in 2014 after the standard is finalized – before 160MHz channels and multi-gigabit speeds become a reality. The max speed over an 80MHz channel is 433.3Mbps, and there aren’t any 802.11ac chipsets that support up to eight streams.

Broadcom logoKevin Fitchard at GigaOM reports that recently the Wi-Fi Alliance kicked off its 802.11ac certification program. First to get the official Wi-Fi stamp of approval was the Samsung Mega 6.3, followed by two other Samsung models.

As with the 802.11n certification process, the Wi-Fi equipment makers are moving faster than the standards bodies. The IEEE is actually still putting the finishing touches on the 802.11ac standard, which is not due until 2014.

Wi-Fi certifiedThe Wi-Fi Alliance expects the first batch of ac devices will support speeds of 433 Mbps and progress into more advanced levels of the standard. The Alliance has pre-certified systems from companies like Broadcom (BRCM), Qualcomm (QCOM), Realtek, and Marvell (MRVL). Cisco (CSCO) was one of the first vendors to get an access point certified.

“AC is going into mobile and portable devices first…,” Wi-Fi Alliance Marketing and Program Management Director Kelly Davis-Felner said. ABI Research estimates that 40 percent of all ac devices shipped in 2013 will be handsets.

rb-

Wi-Fi will replace wired Ethernet networkingWhile tech pundits argue that the new 802.11ac Wi-Fi will replace wired gigabit Ethernet networking at home and in the office. While the consumerization of IT and BYOD are strong forces, the life-cycle of cabling infrastructure is 25 years, a cost not lightly abandoned in the walls. it is more likely to happen at home first. Who wants all the crappy wires running all over the house?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Is Connected Car Data Worth $1,400 Annually?

Is Connected Car Data Worth $1,400 Annually?Michael Strong at TheDetroitBureau.com reports that Continental AG and Cisco (CSCO) recently demoed a highly connected car using the internet to improve vehicle safety and infotainment options at the recent Center for Automotive Research Management Briefing Seminars in Traverse City, MI.

Cisco logoThe firms believe they’ve produced a connected car that provides a balance between giving consumers a safe, connected driving experience while providing companies with a chance to offer services that enhance the driving experience: for a price.

According to the article, the companies involved in bringing the Internet to cars collect an enormous amount of information about drivers. This presents a variety of challenges when it comes to privacy, who owns the information, how can or should it be used and what’s it worth?

data generated by a connected car is worth about $1,400 a year.While privacy and data ownership issues are still up in the air thanks to the U.S. government. Andreas Mai, director of product management at Cisco, believes data generated by a connected car is worth about $1,400 a year.  He breaks it down this way:

  • Drivers can save $550 through better fuel economy, less time stuck in traffic, lower insurance rates, etc.
  • Society can save $420 by employing car platoons to speed up traffic and increase a road’s capacity.
  • Service providers can earn $150 by providing traffic guidance, navigation, parking, emergency services, etc.
  • Automakers can save $300 in lower warranty costs, profitable apps, etc.

The key, according to the article, is to maximize the information that can be collected (and re-sold) is convincing drivers that they get a tangible benefit from releasing the data, such as shorter commutes or lower insurance rates (thanks Flo). According to a survey by Cisco, 74% of drivers were willing to share vehicle information. However, who or what owns that information still needs to be sorted out, he said. They must balance all of those things against the driver’s wants and needs: connectivity, infotainment, and cutting-edge safety features.

Cars switch between 3G, 4G, WiFi, and DSRC on the goThe firms believe they’ve produced a connected car that provides a balance between giving consumers a safe, connected driving experience while providing companies with a chance to offer services that enhance the driving experience: for a price.

Continental and Cisco teamed up to keep the bits flying. As a vehicle moves it needs to prioritize the critical needs of drivers and passengers for network connectivity, according to the article. Digital Trends explains that Continental will supply the hardware and Cisco will provide the software. The car can switch between 3G, 4G, WiFi, and Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) on the go, depending on service quality and cost to the customer. DSRC system is part of the emerging vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) technology system that allows cars to communicate with each other directly – and autonomously.

A Cisco software router loaded in Continental hardware performs the network switching. The router sends signals first to a Cisco-managed “Connected Car Cloud,” which then relays information to whatever network appears optimal at the moment.

 Connected Car Concept

The Cisco on-board software system can seamlessly switch between available 3G, 4G, and other wireless networks based on cost and quality of service preferences. “Connected vehicles are opening up a vast field of opportunities for services to make driving safer, more efficient, and more comfortable,” said Ralf Lenninger, head of innovation and strategy, Continental’s Interior Division. “This is why we are looking at ways to connect the moving vehicle in a highly secure, fast, and reliable way.

the same amount of network security that is available at homeThe Cisco and Continental proof-of-concept connected car show how auto manufactures can provide the same amount of network security that is available at home (oh NO!) or in the office. Cisco provides one highly secure software gateway that delivers Cisco’s core networking capabilities and optimizes multiple communication links and mobility services to and from the vehicle. Security against cyber attacks will become more important as more vehicles include connected functions.

rb-

I recently covered Ford’s efforts to understand connected cars by studying the commlinks of space-based robots here.

The savings claims seem suspicious to me. The “lower insurance costs” are just cash savings. Oh, yeah Walmart is still in business. What is going to be the costs to the drivers after the insurance companies get their Hadoop big data analytics on the data from the magic boxes they are installing? Will they use the data you provided them to change the rules on your policy to raise your rates? It only takes a small leap to think about what the NSA could do with the data.

Just in case someone at Cisco or Ford or anybody else is reading this, here are some suggestions from Veracode to secure connected cars.. 

Versacode Connected Car infographic

Infographic by Veracode Application Security

 

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.