Tag Archive for Intel

Tech World Financial Results

FMoney Makes the Tech World Gou Roundoxconn, Microsoft and Intel just reported financial results, and things look different. Apple is more profitable than Microsoft, MSFT’s most profitable division are toys and Intel says server growth for the mobile web is driving its growth.

Foxconn financial results

Foxconn financial results Jump in 2010the world’s manufacturer of all things tech recently posted its latest earnings report. TechEye points out that despite inconveniences like having to pay workers a slightly larger pittance and give them better working conditions, Foxconn has announced a 53% rise in consolidated revenues for 2010. Terry Gou‘s company’s gross profit for the twelve months increased by 58.5% to NT$100.9 billion from NT$63.6 billion in 2009.

Digitimes says the figures are all better than market watchers’ forecasts. Market watchers originally expected rising labor and component costs would seriously impact Foxconn’s profitability in 2010, but the company’s strong revenues last year still managed to boost its overall profitability despite a drop of 1.37 percentage points in its gross margin from the 2009 level to 8.15%.

Microsoft

Windows Sales Down Microsoft Profits Up 31%Microsoft’s (MSFT) profits grew 3% during its fiscal 3rd quarter ending March 31, 2011. During this period, the software giant racked up $5.23 billion in profits, while revenues reached $16.43 billion, a 13 percent climb. These profits came thanks to strong performance from some nontraditional divisions.

MSFT’s Entertainment and Devices Division provided the biggest revenue gain. The home of Xbox and Kinect, Ballmer’s boys motion-sensing game controller increased sales by 60 percent to $1.94 billion.  This is the smallest of Microsoft’s product divisions so it only generated 11.8 percent of overall sales. According to CNET. Kinect drove sales, selling 2.4 million units in the quarter according to the New York Times. CNET reports the company sold 2.7 million Xbox 360 consoles in the quarter, a 79 percent increase from last year.

Microsoft‘s second-largest revenue generator this quarter was the Windows and Windows Live Division which had revenue of $4.45 billion. This represents a 4 percent decrease from last year’s $4.65 billion and net income fell 10 percent. According to CNET Redmond says Windows is the fastest-selling operating system in history with 350 million licenses sold.

The Server and Tools Division saw the next best performance. The home to Windows Server had sales of $4.1 billion, up 11 percent from a year ago. Profit for the unit climbed 12 percent. CNET says business adoption of Windows Server, SQL Server and System Center lifted the division’s results.

At the Business Division, home of Office, Microsoft’s revenue grew 21 percent from last year according to the NYT. The NYT says the company’s Office software has no significant competition revenue grew to $5.25 billion. Office 2010 is the fastest-selling version of Office ever, Microsoft said, with businesses deploying the software at five times the rate of its predecessor.

Microsoft’s smallest revenue generator the Online Services Division, home of Bing gained 14 percent in revenue to $648 million from $566 million.TechEye reports that Bing increased its share of the search market but Microsoft spent so much on promotion the division saw operating losses of over $700 million. Ballmer’s partners are not happy with these results.  Two years ago, Microsoft and Yahoo inked a deal to use MSFT technologies for Yahoo’s search to help both fight off rival Google. However, Yahoo’s chief executive, Carol A. Bartz, said that the partnership had not yielded the expected financial results for Yahoo and that technical glitches by Microsoft were to blame according to the NYT.

Intel

Chip giant Intel (INTC) has finally found a way into the mobile market. After years of trying to get its Atom chips into mobile devices, they are profiting from the demand for servers to feed the mobile devices. Intel Chief Financial Officer Stacy Smith told Bloomberg that the spread of mobile devices fuels “explosive” growth for processors used in data centers. “There’s a significant, maybe even an insatiable, demand driver for more and more performance and computing power that’s moving into the cloud,” Mr. Smith told Bloomberg. “What gets lost is the explosive growth of all of these devices connecting to the Internet is driving a $10 billion dollar server business.” Intel recently reported that its second-quarter revenue will be $1 billion more than analysts had estimated, in part driven by the data center boom.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Wireless Charging Amped Up

Wireless Charging Amped UpThose of us tired of dealing with tangled cord and bulky wall warts may get some relief in the near future. iSuppli Corp. is predicting that a flood of new electronic gizmos with wireless charging capabilities will be inundating the market. The market research firm believes that the global market for wireless charging devices for smartphones like the RIM (RIMM) Torch, tablet computers such as the Apple (AAPL) iPad2 media players like the Apple iPod Touch will drive the global market for wireless charging devices to 234.9 million units in 2014, up 65% from 3.6 million in 2010, according to iSuppli.

iSuppli table Tina Teng, senior analyst for wireless research at iSuppli told Itnewslink.com, “Over the next five years, wireless charging devices will find their way into an increasing number of applications, including mobile phones, portable media players, digital still cameras, and mobile PCs.”

Mobile phones will drive wireless charging acceptance according to Ms. Teng, ” …mobile phones will contribute the largest share of revenue to wireless charging-not only because of the large volume of mobile devices expected to benefit from the technology, but also because of participation by name brands in manufacturing the device, providing much-needed market recognition in the process.”

“Genius of Electricity,” 1915, Gilded Bronze, Bedminster, NJ. Photography Lee sandstead"Despite the optimism, iSuppli believes there are still barriers to the widespread adoption of wireless charging. Manufacturers will have to make wireless charging in their devices down to the circuit board level which will drive down costs. The wireless charging industry will need to adopt a common standard to ensure interoperability among products. Currently, all products are proprietary. Skins made by one company, will not work with the charger pad of another. “Until the industry finds a standard to follow, the wireless charging industry will be fragmented, and consumers will hesitate to adopt any solution that could be compromised by the rival companies,” Itnewslink.com quotes Ms. Teng, “However, an open, standardized system will create a healthier competitive environment and prompt manufacturers to join forces-which will enhance consumer awareness and lead to adoption in the markets.”

There are four wireless charging technologies. The wireless charging technologies include Near-field magnetic resistance, Far-field magnetic resistance, Conductive magnetic resistance, and Inductive magnetic resistance wireless charging systems.

  • Far-field magnetic resonance, a technology that has raised safety as well as health concerns and for which no commercial products are available for the time being.
  • Inductive wireless charging uses the principle of electromagnetic induction where current generated from the induced magnetic field in the receiver coil charges devices is the most widely wireless charging technology adopted by the value chain.  the technology enjoys wide support from semiconductor vendors, device manufacturers, accessories makers as well as retailers according to the Wireless Design and Development website. The most successful proponent of magnetic induction is Powermat, a Michigan-based company which I wrote about in 2010, that also owned 62 percent share of the wireless charging market as reported by Wireless Design and Development.

iSuppli notes that most companies are not ready with commercial products yet, several high-profile manufacturers are looking at producing wireless charging solutions. The companies include Texas Instruments (TXN) and ST-Ericsson from the semiconductor side; Nokia Corp (NOK) and Research In Motion Ltd. from the device manufacturer side; and Logitech (LOGI) and Case-Mate from the accessory manufacturer side.

Product-specific wireless charging systems consist of a charger as well as a so-called “skin” or receiver sold for specific devices. These product-specific devices contrast with aftermarket solutions, which are universal chargers and various skins that can be used with multiple consumer electronics. Growth is also projected for aftermarket wireless charging, with revenue rising at a massive five-year Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 133.4 percent.

Rats nest of cablesrb-

I hate the cluttered cluster of cables on my desk. The wireless chargers should clean up that mess, but until the manufacturers get their act together and build in some interoperability from the factory, they still got a problem.

What do you think?

Is wireless charging a practical technology?

Do you have a wireless charging rig?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Big Tech Increases Lobbying

Big Tech Increases LobbyingThe Business Insider has a great post that lays out the lobbying spending by most of the techs stalwarts. Arik Hesseldahl at All Things D compiled the data. The data says that the telecom’s spent the most on lobbying last year. The biggest spender was Verizon (VZ) which spent $3.83 million, an increase of nearly $1 million over last year. AT&T (T) spent $3.47 million on lobbying.

Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) spent $1.6 million on lobbying in 2010, which is nearly double what it spent last year. Microsoft (MSFT), Oracle (ORCL), Google (GOOG), IBM (IBM), and Yahoo (YHOO) also increased the dollars spent on lobbying from 2009 to 2010. Only Intel (INTC) decreased its lobbying spending in 2010.

Tech Spending on Lobbying 2010

The Business Insider points out that despite their incredible influence in the world of tech, Apple (AAPL) and Facebook are hardly spending anything on lobbying. The post speculates that while Apple is influential, it doesn’t dominate anything other than mp3 players, so the government has had little reason to mess with it. (Apple rules the tablet world, but that’s an 8-month-old market.) Also, Apple doesn’t do big blockbuster acquisitions that the government looks at.

Facebook spent the least of anyone with just $120,000. The author expects this will change soon as the company’s power is growing quickly, drawing the eye of regulators.

rb-

The telecom monoliths spent $7.3 million on lobbying, which is more than HP, MSFT, Google and IBM combined what are they up to? I wrote about AT&T’s activities previously, clearly, these firms expect something back from the politicians they bribe donate to. History has proven that the politicians on the receiving end of the bribes donations generate results for their largest contributors and not the SMB or end-user.

What do you think? What are these tech stalwarts getting for their money in Washington DC?

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Server Counts Climbing

Server Counts ClimbingData Center Knowledge has updated its list of companies with the most servers (at least the ones that release the information). I wrote about this server list last year and some of the changes from last year include adding Intel (INTC) and Facebook to the list, SoftLayer’s acquisition of The Planet, and increases in server fleets.

Server Growth

FirmServers (2009)Servers (2010)% change
Intel--100,000NA
OVH55,00080,00045
SoftLayer21,00076,000262
Akamai Technologies48,00073,00052
1&1 Internet55,00070,00027
Rackspace50,03863,99628
Facebook--60,000NA
iWeb10,00035,000250

Some notable companies that have not changed since 2009 include:

* SBC Communications
* Verizon
* Time Warner
* AT&T
* Peer1/ServerBeach.

rb-

One thing that many of these companies have in common is that they are cloud companies or companies that enable cloud computing. The research firm IDC reported in 2009 that only 14.3% (2.2 Exabytes) of the 15.4 Exabytes of enterprise storage capacity resides in the public cloud. IDC believes this number will grow to 27.6% by 2013.

If IDC is right,  over the next 3-4 years, server fleets will continue to grow.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Terabit Ethernet Developing

Terabit Ethernet DevelopingResearchers at the University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) are working on the next evolution of Ethernet – Terabit Ethernet. UCSB Professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Dan Blumenthal told LightReading that the goal of the recently created Terabit Optical Ethernet Center (TOEC), is to create Terabit Ethernet (TbE) which runs at 1 trillion bits per second by 2015 and to follow it up with 100Tbit/s Ethernet by 2020.

Professor Blumenthal explained to LightReading that he wants the TOEC and its partners to produce something the industry can use, not a one-time lab experiment that only works with duct tape and glue. “We’re not talking about lab hero experiments,” Blumenthal told LightReading. The real-world focus of TOEC has helped attract partners like  Agilent Technologies Inc. (NYSE: A), Google (NASDAQ: GOOG), Intel Corp. (NASDAQ: INTC), Rockwell Collins Inc., and Verizon Communications Inc. (NYSE: VZ) to help with the research. I wrote about Intel’s TBPS efforts back in July.

Terabit Ethernet is hard

TOEC could probably use the help because developing TbE is looking like no simple task according to LightReading. Bob Metcalfe, Ethernet’s creator, and now a Polaris Venture Partners partner, speculated two years ago that a terabit standard might need a rethinking of everything, even the fiber itself.

Based on current UCSB research, professor Blumenthal speculates that TbE  may include:

  • Photonic integrated circuits (PICs) are a must.
  • Coherent receivers, but at a scale well beyond what’s being used for 100Gbit/s Ethernet. A likely candidate is 1,024-QAM: quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) transmitting 10 bits per symbol, a scheme likely to require 100GHz electronics.
  • To make that coherent receiver energy-efficient, TOEC is “trying to move a lot of what’s in the digital signal processor into the optics,” Blumenthal says.
  • New materials for fiber-optics aren’t out of the question. “We won’t start out with that, but it’ll move in that direction,” Blumenthal says.
  • Other items on the TOEC shopping list include optical phase-locked loops, new semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs), and methods for drastically lowering on-chip optical losses.

The questions go beyond the optical layer. To make operations more synchronous padding and frame delineation were added to 10Gbit/s and 100Gbit/s Ethernet, Blumenthal pointed out. “Do we keep doing that? Or do we go purely asynchronous? We don’t know yet. …Once you put the word ‘Ethernet’ in there, it’s not about just transmission. It’s about being backward-compatible. That’s the beauty of Ethernet. We can’t lose that essence.

rb-

The need for TbE is real (I first wrote about Intel’s TbE efforts here) and being driven by video. More video is already riding over existing networks. “We’re going to need much faster networking to handle the explosion in Internet traffic and support new large-scale applications like cloud computing,” Professor Blumenthal told Physorg. Stuart Elby, Vice President of Network Architecture for Verizon told Physorg, “Based on current traffic growth, it’s clear that 1 Terabit per second trunks will be needed in the near future.”

Facebook is already looking at TbE in their data centers. PCWorld reports that at the Ethernet Alliance‘s Technology Exploration Forum, Donn Lee, a Facebook Engineer said, “… there is already a need for 1 terabit.” Facebook has so many servers, and those servers can process data so fast, that they could fill 64 Terabit Ethernet pipes in the backbone of one data center, Lee said.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.