Tag Archive for LinkedIn

5 Tips To Make Meetings Less Painful

5 Tips To Make Meetings Less PainfulSalesCrunch has created a guide to “meetings that don’t suck.” The firm collected data from its management software, which tracks things like if people are really paying attention (looking at the screen or not), and if follow-up materials are opened. The BusinessInsider says the Web conferencing company crunched the numbers and came up with 5 good tips for the next time you call a meeting.

1. The 15-minute meeting. No meeting should last more than 30 minutes. After 30 minutes, they are giving one-quarter of their attention to something else.

2.  Everyone needs to talk.  If all participants talk, people will give the meeting 92% of their attention. If someone is yammering on, it gets only 78% of their attention.

3. Send follow-up materials within 5 minutes. Nearly two-thirds of attendees will read them within one day. A few more will be read the next day, but not many.

4. Shorter follow-up materials are better read. People will spend 52 seconds with a short follow-up. But they will spend only 10 seconds on a mega 100-slide deck.

5. Reach out via LinkedIn immediately. Nearly three-quarters of meeting attendees will accept a new LinkedIn connection after an online meeting.

rb-

Some of these I do better than others. I like to keep my meeting simple while trying to engage everybody in the conversation. My follow-ups tend to be more formal meeting notes so they take longer to get them out. So my meetings are less painful than others.

Don't Such at Meetings

© 2012 SalesCrunch

 

Related articles
  • Study finds web conferencing popular but underutilized (shoretel.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

25 Most-Used Passwords Revealed

25 Most-Used Passwords RevealedRachel King at ZDNet’s Zero Day writes that the recent data breaches at LinkedIn, Last.fm, and eHarmony has put passwords back in the spotlight. Unfortunately, many people still rely on “password” to secure their digital identity. Antivirus software provider ESET noted some recent work by IT security consultant Mark Burnett who has compiled a list of the “top 500 worst (aka most common) passwords” based on a variety of methods he has detailed on his blog. The entire list is available here (ZIP).

25 Worst passwords

20122011
password
password
123456
123456
12345678
12345678
1234
qwerty
qwerty
abc123
12345
monkey
dragon
1234567
pussy
letmein
baseball
trustno1
football
dragon
letmein
baseball
monkey
111111
696969
iloveyou
abc123
master
mustang
sunshine
michael
ashley
shadow
bailey
master
passw0rd
jennifer
shadow
111111
123123
2000
654321
jordansuperman
supermanqazwsx
harleymichael
1234567football
2012 data from xato.net and 2011 data from SplashData.com

rb-
Why don't they listenApproximately 2/3’s of the worst passwords stayed the same between 2011 and 2012. Are your users’ passwords on this list? If so, it’s safe to say you should consider a password change policy to force them into using a stronger password.

I have written about passwords since at least 2010 – here, here, and here. When will they listen?

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Social Media Malware Launch Pads

Social Media Malware Launch PadsSocial networks’ role in the growth of the global virtual society has been well documented. What is not so well documented according to Help Net Security is the role social media has in spreading malware. The security and privacy mechanisms of social networking firms such as LinkedIn (LNKD), Twitter, and Facebook (FB) have proven insufficient to prevent exploitation.

Social networkThe article notes that “To Err is Human,” and human errors lead to exploitation and manipulation whether the social network is online or offline. Social media hold a plethora of personal information on the users that create the network. Individual connections between users collectively form a web of connections. To build each link between users an implicit trust is required between the two users and implicitly across the entire network. Any information provided by an individual user through chained connections becomes a part of the full network. When an attacker is able to exploit one user in the social network, they have the potential to be able to push malicious content into the network. The network’s connectivity enables the spread of exploitation. The blog explains that attackers exploit the weakest link in the chain.

The inability of users to determine the legitimacy of content flowing through the social media helps this exploitation process. Help Net Security says the biggest problem with online social networks is that they do not have built-in protection against malware. For example, current social networks do not scan the URLs and embedded content coming from third-party servers such as Content Delivery Networks. Therefore, there is no way to authenticate the URLs passed among the user objects in the social networks.

exploitation of human ignoranceThe infection process begins with the exploitation of human ignorance and followed by the spreading of the malware through the trust upon which the network is based.

The article further explains that to start the exploitation process, an attacker will pick an issue that affects human emotions to evoke a response so the social network user will do something the attacker wishes. Phishing and spam messages about weather calamities, politics, and financial transactions are used for starting infections. The author states that since social network exploitation begins by exploiting an individual’s ignorance common attack strategies have emerged.

FacebookOne of the simplest infection techniques is to put malicious URLs on a user’s Facebook message wall. When a user clicks on an illegitimate hyperlink it can result in the automatic download of malware through the browser. Some of the exploits used are:

  • Browser Exploit Packs (BEP) fingerprint the browser version and other software on the user machine. Based on this information, a suitable malware is served to the user which uses exploits for that particular browser.
  • Drive-by-Download attacks begin by visiting a malicious Malicious advertisementspage. They exploit vulnerabilities in browsers and plugins. Successful exploitation of the vulnerability causes a shellcode to run that in turn downloads the malware into the system.
  • Malicious advertisements (malvertisements) happen when an attacker injects a malicious link into a user’s Facebook wall to spread malware. The fake post is linked to a third-party website that has malicious advertisements embedded in it. These advertisements are linked to malicious JavaScripts which execute the malicious content in the browser.

Trojan horseHelp Net Security states that online social media is not harnessing the power of Safe Browsing API’s from Google (GOOG) or similar services to instantiate a verification procedure before posting a URL back to a user profile. Lack of such basic protections is a key factor in making the social networks vulnerable to exploitation.

Microsoft (MSFT) recently spotted a Facebook attack in the wild that exploited Facebook user’s trust in a social engineering campaign. The attack tries to trick Facebook users into installing a backdoor Trojan with keylogging capabilities according to the Help Net Security report.

MSFT says the Facebook Wall messages varied but they all lead to fake YouTube pages. Once there, the user is urged to download a new version of “Video Embed ActiveX Object” to play the video file. Unfortunately, the offered setup.exe file is the Caphaw Trojan.

The trojan bypasses firewalls, installs an FTP and a proxy server, and a key logger on the affected machine. Microsoft’s Mihai Calota says ” … has built-in remote desktop functionality based on the open-source VNC project.” MSFT says the Facebook attack can be used to steal money, “We received a report .. that money had been transferred from his bank account … The keylogging component, coupled with the remote desktop functionality, makes it entirely possible for this to have happened.

rb-

The articles correctly state that security and privacy mechanisms are indispensable for safe online social networking. Built-in security is necessary because attackers exploit the trust, curiosity, and ignorance of the social network customers to their own profit. Users should demand safe and secure transmission of the information and the user’s privacy. These should also be a focus of the social networking companies.

To protect themselves, users should:

  • What does thi do?Have up to date AV software running on their computers
  • Keep their browsers and operating systems fully patched
  • Change the passwords on all their sensitive accounts regularly
  • Warn friends and Facebook if an account seems to be hacked by using the Facebook “report/mark message as spam” option.
Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Credit Agency Trawls Facebook

GigaOm has an article that documents the efforts by Schufa, the largest credit rating firm in Germany to mine data from the Facebook (FB), LinkedIn (LNKD), and Twitter accounts of its customers. David Meyer cites documents leaked to German media, that the firm whose slogan is “We Build Confidence” would use the information “to identify and evaluate opportunities for and threats to the company.

“It cannot be that social networks are systematically scoured for sensitive data, resulting in credit ratings of customers,” said consumer protection minister Ilse Aigner.

rb-

Get over it.

Facebook logoI wrote about firms like RapLeaf mining social networks for employers and banks back in 2010. What is surprising to me and Mr. Meyer is that this latest social network mining operation comes out of Europe and especially Germany, a country where most people are very conscious of data protection concerns.

This goes back to the internet-age-old issue of privacy. Where is the line between public and private is it different for some groups than others? Do the NSA, CIA, MI5, and whoever else is listening get different access to data than Rapleaf, Apple (AAPL), Facebook, Twitter?

Just because the info is out there, public by default do they have the right to use it?

Get over itOn the other hand users of Facebook and Foursquare happily tie their credit cards to these accounts, post status updates, and check in to places for the world to see.  

Maybe we are just getting what we deserve.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedIn, Facebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Bad Day at LinkedIn

Bad Day at LinkedInIt’s been a bad day for LinkedIn (LNKD). LinkedIn users have been the victim of two security and privacy blunders on the same day. First, the LinkedIn mobile app for iOS devices is sending potentially confidential private and business information to the company servers without the users’ knowledge.

LinkedIn logoHelp Net Security reports that security researchers Yair Amit and Adi Sharabani at Skycure Security identified the security hole. According to the researchers, the security flaw involves calendar syncing which collects data from all the calendars (private and corporate) on the iOS device.

“The app doesn’t only send the participant lists of meetings; it also sends out the subject, location, time of meeting and more importantly personal meeting notes, which tend to contain highly sensitive information such as conference call details and passcodes,” the researchers point out in the article. “…this information is collected and transmitted to LinkedIn’s servers; moreover, this action is currently performed without a clear indication from the app to the user, thus possibly violating Apple’s privacy guidelines.”

The first response from LinkedIn‘s spokeswoman Nicole Perlroth appears to minimize the issue and blame the users for the privacy breach when she told Help Net Security that the feature is opt-in, and said nothing about whether the company will update the app that would stop this privacy snafu from happening in the future. (Looks like LinkedIn updated the App and broke it according to reviews in the Apple AppStore) This was reinforced by Joff Redfern, Mobile Product Head at LinkedIn on the LinkedIn blog where he also pointed out the information harvesting app is an opt-in feature. He claims that the information collected is not stored or shared. LinkedIn did change the LinkedIn app for Google (GOOG) Android so it no longer sends data from Droids to LinkedIn. There was no information in the article if LinkedIn plans to change the Apple iOS app.

But wait it gets worse…

LinkedIn also lost 6.5 million accounts today. They were however found on a Russian forum. LinkedIn has confirmed on their blog that there are “compromised accounts.” Cameron Camp, Security Researcher at ESET, commented on the leak for Help Net Security:

“The difference with this hack … is that people put their REAL information about themselves professionally on the site not just what party they plan on attending, ala Facebook and others …  mess with somebody’s professional profile, and you’re messing with their life, and their contacts know about it.”

rb-

I wrote about the value of different credentials here and here.

I am wondering about the timing of the two security problems for LinkedIn. Could they be related? Were attackers using the Apple iOS app as an attack vector? After all, we know that Apple loves to collect personal info on its customers.

Mitt Romney

What happened here?

Action Items:

  • Toggle off the “Add Your Calendar” option in the Sync Calendar feature of the LinkedIn app on your Apple iOS devices
  • Immediately change your LinkedIn password and any accounts that share the same password.
  • Be on the lookout for phishing campaigns that might leverage the incident.
Related articles

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.