Tag Archive for Microsoft

Privacy on IPv6 Networks

Privacy on IPv6 Networks

Internet service providers, websites, and equipment vendors around the globe took part in the World IPv6 launch in June, Internet companies including AT&T (T), Cisco (CSCO), Comcast (CMCSA), Facebook (FB), Google (GOOG), Microsoft (MSFT), Verizon Wireless (VZ), and Yahoo (YHOO) decided to permanently turn on IPv6. A small fraction of Internet users and devices have started communicating via IPv6 networks, with more and more transitioning to the new protocol over the coming months and years. There are security and privacy implications in the switch to IPv6.

IPv6All kinds of devices will get new IPv6 numbers as the addressing format grows. The IPv6 addresses for these networked devices can be generated in a number of different ways and the choice of how they are created has potentially wide-reaching effects for security and privacy Center for Democracy & Technology explains. One of the original methods for assigning new addresses involved using a unique device identifier (known as a MAC address) as the suffix of the IPv6 address. This method creates a permanent, unique address for a device, potentially allowing any server that the device communicates with to indefinitely track the user.

IPv6 designers soon realized the potential security and privacy problems of MAC-based addresses; as a result, they created an alternate method known as “privacy extensions” or “privacy addresses” the article reports. The privacy extensions use a randomly generated number instead of a MAC address. In order to protect privacy on an IPv6 network, the random number is unrelated to any device identifier and in practice lasts no more than a week (and often much less time), ensuring that the user’s IP address cannot be used for long-term user tracking.

SmartphoneIt is up to operating system vendors to choose which IP address assignment method will be the default on their devices. The author says that some vendors have made good choices, particularly within the last year. Microsoft has long led the charge on IPv6 privacy, with privacy extensions on by default in all versions of Microsoft Windows since the release of Windows XP nearly a decade ago. Apple followed suit last year, with privacy extensions activated by default in all versions of Mac OS X since 10.7 (Lion) and with the release of iOS 4.3 for iPhone and iPad. Google did likewise in its Android 4.0 release last year.

The CDT says that as long as Internet users choose to upgrade their operating systems to the latest versions, they should be protected against perpetual security and privacy threats from IPv6 network address tracking.

rb-

mobile OS's send private information about their users to the networHowever, I wrote about reports from H.Security that mobile operating systems do not protect security or privacy on IPv6 networks. The report says mobile OSs send private information about their users to the network. The H.Security article says this is not a flaw in IPv6, rather it is lazy programming in some cases. The article points out that neither Apple’s iOS nor Android devices have the option to enable Privacy Extensions or the option to disable IPv6. apparently, the only thing smartphones need is a control option in the user interface to protect mobile OS users’ privacy and security on an IPv6 network.

Related articles
  • Romania Has the Fastest IPv6 Adoption Rate (maindevice.com)

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Malware Launches Massive Print Jobs

Malware Launches Massive Print JobsIf your printers start printing garbage characters until they run out of paper, it’s a sure sign your network has been hit by the Milicenso Trojan malware. Help Net Security reports that Symantec (SYMC) researchers have found that the garbled printouts are just a side effect of the infection and not its goal. The malware’s last variants have an extremely low detection rate – only 4 of the 42 solutions used by Virus Total detect them at the moment.

Trojan horse malwareThe article says the Milicenso Trojan is actually a backdoor used to deliver other malware on the affected machines. The infection vectors are links and malicious attachments in unsolicited emails, as well as websites hosting malicious scripts that trigger the download of the Trojan. “The Trojan creates and executes a dropper executable, which in turn creates a DLL file in the %System% folder”, shared the Symantec researchers.

The heavily encrypted DLL file creates a number of EXE and DLL files and uses a number of routines to discover whether the execution environment is a virtual machine, public malware sandbox or a black-boxing site. The Trojan also drops a piece of adware, whose aim is to serve as a decoy for AV solutions present on the machines. The blog says the  Adware.Eorezo has only one goal: to point Internet Explorer to an ad-relater URL.

Sandbox environmentHelp Net Security explains the malware triggers the massive printing by exploiting the Windows default print spooler directory. “During the infection phase, a .spl file is created in [DRIVE_LETTER]system32Spool PRINTERS[RANDOM].spl. Note the Windows’ default print spooler directory is %System%spoolprinters.”

The researchers explained “The .spl file, while appearing to be a common printer spool file, is actually an executable file and is detected as Adware.Eorezo. Depending on the configuration, any files, including binary files, created in that folder will trigger print jobs.”

rb-

I have written about the risks of copiers and printers here and here. I’m sure someone will figure out how to use this malware as a direct DOS on printers, and not as a side effect.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Social Media Malware Launch Pads

Social Media Malware Launch PadsSocial networks’ role in the growth of the global virtual society has been well documented. What is not so well documented according to Help Net Security is the role social media has in spreading malware. The security and privacy mechanisms of social networking firms such as LinkedIn (LNKD), Twitter, and Facebook (FB) have proven insufficient to prevent exploitation.

Social networkThe article notes that “To Err is Human,” and human errors lead to exploitation and manipulation whether the social network is online or offline. Social media hold a plethora of personal information on the users that create the network. Individual connections between users collectively form a web of connections. To build each link between users an implicit trust is required between the two users and implicitly across the entire network. Any information provided by an individual user through chained connections becomes a part of the full network. When an attacker is able to exploit one user in the social network, they have the potential to be able to push malicious content into the network. The network’s connectivity enables the spread of exploitation. The blog explains that attackers exploit the weakest link in the chain.

The inability of users to determine the legitimacy of content flowing through the social media helps this exploitation process. Help Net Security says the biggest problem with online social networks is that they do not have built-in protection against malware. For example, current social networks do not scan the URLs and embedded content coming from third-party servers such as Content Delivery Networks. Therefore, there is no way to authenticate the URLs passed among the user objects in the social networks.

exploitation of human ignoranceThe infection process begins with the exploitation of human ignorance and followed by the spreading of the malware through the trust upon which the network is based.

The article further explains that to start the exploitation process, an attacker will pick an issue that affects human emotions to evoke a response so the social network user will do something the attacker wishes. Phishing and spam messages about weather calamities, politics, and financial transactions are used for starting infections. The author states that since social network exploitation begins by exploiting an individual’s ignorance common attack strategies have emerged.

FacebookOne of the simplest infection techniques is to put malicious URLs on a user’s Facebook message wall. When a user clicks on an illegitimate hyperlink it can result in the automatic download of malware through the browser. Some of the exploits used are:

  • Browser Exploit Packs (BEP) fingerprint the browser version and other software on the user machine. Based on this information, a suitable malware is served to the user which uses exploits for that particular browser.
  • Drive-by-Download attacks begin by visiting a malicious Malicious advertisementspage. They exploit vulnerabilities in browsers and plugins. Successful exploitation of the vulnerability causes a shellcode to run that in turn downloads the malware into the system.
  • Malicious advertisements (malvertisements) happen when an attacker injects a malicious link into a user’s Facebook wall to spread malware. The fake post is linked to a third-party website that has malicious advertisements embedded in it. These advertisements are linked to malicious JavaScripts which execute the malicious content in the browser.

Trojan horseHelp Net Security states that online social media is not harnessing the power of Safe Browsing API’s from Google (GOOG) or similar services to instantiate a verification procedure before posting a URL back to a user profile. Lack of such basic protections is a key factor in making the social networks vulnerable to exploitation.

Microsoft (MSFT) recently spotted a Facebook attack in the wild that exploited Facebook user’s trust in a social engineering campaign. The attack tries to trick Facebook users into installing a backdoor Trojan with keylogging capabilities according to the Help Net Security report.

MSFT says the Facebook Wall messages varied but they all lead to fake YouTube pages. Once there, the user is urged to download a new version of “Video Embed ActiveX Object” to play the video file. Unfortunately, the offered setup.exe file is the Caphaw Trojan.

The trojan bypasses firewalls, installs an FTP and a proxy server, and a key logger on the affected machine. Microsoft’s Mihai Calota says ” … has built-in remote desktop functionality based on the open-source VNC project.” MSFT says the Facebook attack can be used to steal money, “We received a report .. that money had been transferred from his bank account … The keylogging component, coupled with the remote desktop functionality, makes it entirely possible for this to have happened.

rb-

The articles correctly state that security and privacy mechanisms are indispensable for safe online social networking. Built-in security is necessary because attackers exploit the trust, curiosity, and ignorance of the social network customers to their own profit. Users should demand safe and secure transmission of the information and the user’s privacy. These should also be a focus of the social networking companies.

To protect themselves, users should:

  • What does thi do?Have up to date AV software running on their computers
  • Keep their browsers and operating systems fully patched
  • Change the passwords on all their sensitive accounts regularly
  • Warn friends and Facebook if an account seems to be hacked by using the Facebook “report/mark message as spam” option.
Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Attackers Attack Emerging Technologies

Help Net Security reports that attackers continue to focus on social engineering attacks and circumventing legacy enterprise security systems according to a recent report by Zscaler. The Sunnyvale, CA-based firm reported shifts in the sources of enterprise web traffic, and that some popular sites attempt to improve user security. Here are some of the top findings detailed in the report:

  • Local apps are generating more direct HTTP and HTTPS traffic
  • Not all web traffic comes from browsers, and as this traffic shifts, web threats have a new attack vector
  • Internet Explorer 6 is on the decline in the enterprise. While this mitigates the security risks of the old browser platform, it could lead to a shift in attacks.
  • Google (GOOG) is actively attempting to thwart search engine optimization (SEO) spam and fake AV attacks, the topmost Internet threats today. However, most users remain exposed to these threats.
  • More sites, like Facebook (FB) and Gmail, are moving to HTTPS delivery. This is good for preventing sidejacking, but it allows savvy attackers a way to bypass traditional network-based security controls like IDS/IPS, which cannot decrypt traffic for inspection.

Internet of Things“Attackers know the limits of traditional security solutions,” says Michael Sutton, VP of Security Research at Zscaler. “But they are also very good at taking advantage of emerging technologies and new vectors for attack. Standalone user applications, social engineering attacks, and the move to HTTPS all have the potential to introduce new threats. Now more than ever, enterprise security solutions must inspect traffic in real-time, all the time, regardless of source, to provide true protection.”

RB-

I have covered IOT for a while here and here. I wrote about the big sites moving to HTTPS a while ago here and even wrote about HTTPS Everywhere here. And I am sure I don’t cost as much as an engagement with these firms.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Security Considerations for IPv6

Security Considerations for IPv6For those who missed the Internet Society (ISOC) announcement that World IPv6 Launch day arrived on June 6. (I blogged about World IPv6 day, back in March) Carl Herberger, VP of Security at Radware (RDWR) recently wrote at Help Net Security that he sees World IPv6 Launch day as much more hype than an operational change.

Internet Society logoMany high-profile organizations have hooked their plans on change over to the ISOC launch date. Supporters include Google (GOOG), Facebook (FB), Microsoft (MSFT) Bing, Yahoo (YHOO), and Akamai (AKAM).  Mr. Herberger points out that many companies have already leveraged IPv6 WAN connectivity. Most mobile providers who have adopted LTE 4G infrastructures have built them for mobile devices, Mobile devices will connect to the Internet with IPv6 addresses by default. He argues that since a 4G phone must also be 3G and IPv4 compatible, the 5G providers have not done much. The service providers have woven IPv6 into the existing IPv4 Internet much to the chagrin of the initial IPv6 designers.

IPv6 Pandora’s Box

Bottom line: Because IPv4 is not going away any time soon, we will essentially live in perpetuity with both designs. A new dawn? Or the beginning of the end? The Radware VP thinks it’s neither, he calls the interoperability issues between IPv4 and IPv6, a Pandora’s Box of opportunity for those of the nefarious persuasion.

So, what are the three main takeaways from World IPv6 Launch day?

Take away #1

Dog and catIPv6 will first be implemented on the WAN, IPv4 will continue to stay in the LAN for years to come – Google, Facebook, DNS, CDN providers, and many, if not most ISP’s are all moving to default IPv6 WAN connectivity. However, nearly no one has made the transition to IPv6 on the LAN. Mr. Herberger adds that rapid IPv6 deployment on the Internet WAN operations side and the very slow rollout of IPv6 on the LAN side will wreak havoc on perimeter security. He believes that there are huge problems associated with IPv4 and IPv6 cohabitating.

Take away #2

IPv6 & IPv4 don’t cohabitate well – IPv6 and IPv4 make insecure bedfellows. There are no predefined standards in the way to handle the cohabitation of IPv4 with IPv6.  The transition mechanisms to ease the transitioning of the Internet from its first IPv4 infrastructure to IPv6 have not been standardized yet. The Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) has working groups and discussions through the IETF Internet-Drafts and Requests for Comments processes to develop these methods. Some basic IPv6 transition mechanisms have been defined; however, nothing has yet emerged as a proposed uniform standard. As such, the article states, the world is awash with a plethora of IPv4 to IPv6 (and vice versa) Transition Mechanisms such as:

  • Encapsulating IPv4 in IPv6 (or 4in6)
  • Encapsulating IPv6 in IPv4 (or 6in4)IPv6 tunnel
  • IPv6 over IPv4 (6over4)
  • DS-Lite
  • 6rd
  • 6to4
  • ISATAP
  • NAT64 / DNS64
  • Teredo
  • SIIT.

If you are familiar with network perimeter security devices, one of the things they do well is deep packet inspection and Stateful aware analysis. However, one of the dirty little secrets is that nearly none of today’s technologies have the capability to inspect encrypted traffic such as SSL  or the ability to inspect tunneling protocols such as L2TP, PPTP, etc. What IPv4 and IPv6 transition does is effectively exacerbate these “Achilles heels” in security detection capabilities by introducing a whole new class of nearly undetectable transmissions. The author warns Don’t be fooled by a vendor’s claim that they inspect a v4 packet in v6 or vice versa, because even if true for one or two methodologies, the ways to carry out this task are almost immeasurable today. This is really a true community-wide problem and one that must be addressed.

Take away #3

ConfusedMeet your old vulnerability – Same as the new vulnerability! Much of our defense is single-threaded, and should an adversary be able to pass through your perimeter defenses, many of the ‘older’ vulnerabilities would find a receptive home having passed through the ‘corporate scrubbers.’Moreover, just think of the new opportunities available to more nefarious organizations that don’t have your interests in mind. This ‘transition mechanism’ essentially becomes an effective ‘unscrubbed’ gateway or tunnel for all newly developed organized crime-designed, state-sponsored, and Hacktivist-motivated attacks.

Moreover, most of us will be largely blind to these realities unless we are acting now to make certain that our gateways are designed with all encapsulated traffic being detected and mitigated. Anomaly detection takes center stage here and signature tools will leave you wanting.

The Radware VP concludes that this problem requires action on behalf of security professionals to solve; you HAVE to do something different because the inertia path will leave you vulnerable.

Related articles

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.