Tag Archive for Business

Follow the Open Source Money

 Matt Asay at Infoworld recently pointed out some interesting data on who really contributes to open source. Wikipedia, the most well-known open-source project, defines open-source software as software whose source code is published and made available to the public, enabling anyone to copy, modify and redistribute the source code without paying royalties or fees. Open-source code can evolve through community cooperation. These communities include individual programmers as well as large companies.

Open sourceAdobe developer Fil Maj used the GitHub REST API to pull public profile information from GitHub users. The REST API is a low-bandwidth protocol used on the internet that allows two software programs to communicate with each other. Using the API, Mr. Maj collected the company field from all 2,060,011 GitHub user profiles who were active in 2017 (“active” meaning ten or more commits to public projects). Using that data, Mr. Maj was able to pull the total number of corporate contributors to GitHub, with results that might surprise you.

Here are the ranking of GitHub contributors, with their total number of employees actively contributing to open source projects on GitHub:

RankCompanyEmployees Contributing
1Microsoft4,550
2Google2,267
3Red Hat2,027
4IBM1,813
5Intel1,314
6Amazon.com881
7SAP747
8ThoughtWorks739
9Alibaba694
10GitHub676
11Facebook619
12Tencent605
13Pivotal591
14EPAM Systems585
15Baidu584
16Mozilla469
17Oracle455
18Unity Technologies414
19Uber388
20Yandex351
21Shopify345
22LinkedIn343
23Suse325
24ESRI324
25Apple292
26Salesforce.com291
27VMware271
28Adobe Systems270
29Andela259
30Cisco Systems233

The author points out, this is not a perfect measure, but it is a much richer, more accurate data set for figuring out total contributors for any company. Even with that caveat in mind, we end up with many more corporate open source contributors than previous data suggested.

Microsoft’s contributions to open source

Microsoft's contributions to open sourceThe new data shows Microsoft (MSFT) is the number 1 open source contributor. Redmond has twice the number of contributors compared to its next nearest competitor. Remember Steve Ballmer‘s developers! developers! developers! meltdown?  For those of us that were around when Mr. Ballmer, the Microsoft CEO called open source as a “cancer” and “anti-American,” this is a remarkable change of heart for MSFT.

Red Hat

Red Hat (RHT) Mr. Maj’s data puts the open source leader among the top contributors. Red Hat has dramatically fewer engineers on its payroll than Google (GOOG) or Microsoft. As such, it’s doubly impressive that Red Hat would place so highly. Pretty much every engineer in the company works on open-source projects.

Amazon

 

Amazon logoAmazon (AMZN) Often considered an open source ne’er-do-well, Amazon comes in at No. 6 in the rankings. AMZN has nearly 900 open source contributors on staff. The article points out that Amazon has perhaps not publicly led the open source effort in the same way as Google and Microsoft have, but it remains a strong contributor to the projects that feed its developer community.

China is a net consumer of open source

Chinese companies like Baidu, Tencent, and Alibaba, which have long been perceived to be net consumers of open source, actually contribute quite a bit according to the new data.

Legacy firms

Legacy firms like Intel (INTC), Oracle (ORCL), Adobe (ADBE), and Cisco (CSCO) rank among the top 30 open source contributors reports InfoWorld.

rb-

Color me suspicious, but have these firms really embraced open source. Have they just adapted their business model to usurp elements of open source to lay their proprietary code on top of it? This saves them the bother of writing new code and yet they can charge proprietary costs for software where they have reduced their development costs.

Tom Brady hanging high fiveAfter all, numbers don’t lie. Stats say that in 2014, half of the companies said they use open source in their product. Just one year later, the number grew to 78%. Consequently, as long as open source continues to enjoy its place in the sun, we should expect the Microsoft-open source bromance to continue.

Related article

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

60 Seconds Online

60 Seconds OnlineThe global internet economy is huge, really huge, and growing. Online provider of market and consumer data, Statista says that retail e-commerce sales worldwide will top 4 Trillion dollars in 2020. Right now the worldwide internet economy takes in an incredible $3.9 million every 60 seconds.

  • Amazon (AMZN) rakes in $204,000 every minute,
  • Ebay (EBAY) rings up $160,000 in sixty seconds, and
  • Cyber-criminals steal over $1000 of other people’s cash each second.

This infographic from E-Commerce fulfillment firm RedStag Fulfillment details what happens in 60 seconds of online e-commerce.RedStag Fulfillment infographic

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

China Trying to Kill Bitcoin

Is China Trying to Kill BitcoinCryptocurrency Bitcoin has been on quite a roller-coaster ride the past weeks. From an all time high of $4,950.72 to $3,537.79 during the first 14 days of September 2017 in four days. That is a loss of nearly $1,413.00 which is over 9 shares of Apple (AAPL) or nearly 19 shares of Microsoft (MSFT). Not only am I skeptical about the value of Bitcoin at these levels, but apparently the Chinese government also is skeptical about cryptocurrencies.

CNET reports that the People’s Bank of China, the central bank of China banned initial coin offerings where bitcoin entrepreneurs and speculators raise funds by launching new digital tokens. ICO’s allowed blockchain startups to raise nearly $2 billion from investors worldwide in 2017. There was no mention of cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin or its rival Ethereum, but the announcement sent stocks sliding anyway.

CNET says PBC ruled that ICOs are a form of “unauthorized and illegal public financing … (which) seriously disrupted economic and financial order” in China. To that end, the country has banned all sales and currency conversions involving digital tokens, and prohibited all financial institutions and non-bank payment organizations from offering any services to ICOs.

Chinese government may be trying to kill BitcoinThe American Banker speculates that the Chinese government may be trying to kill Bitcoin. In a recent article they lay out the case for Chinese regulators putting an end to cybercurrencies.

They point out that the Communist government of China is known for its strict capital controls and sweeping regulatory judgments. This attitude has spilled over to its relationship with cryptocurrencies.

Some observers are quick to point out that China has a long history of using the “Great Firewall of China” to block Western web sites, from Facebook to YouTube to WhatsApp and even VPN’s.

According to AB, the Chinese regulators have instructed all domestic cryptocurrency exchanges to shut down this month, effectively choking off one of the largest markets for the commercial buying and selling of bitcoin and other digital assets.

Further, cryptocurrency exchanges in China must work closely with authorities as they wind down their operations. AB says four major Chinese exchanges—Huobi, ViaBTC, OKCoin and BTC China, at one time the world’s largest by trading volume—have already announced their shutdown.

The moment could be a pivotal one in the evolution of financial services. It could easily be misread both by traditional bankers who could be disrupted and fintech entertainers who see a profit in disrupting the status quo. Bitcoin skeptics such as JPMorgan Chase’s CEO Jamie Dimon who called bitcoin a “fraud” that would soon “blow up.” American Banker believes Mr. Dimon has grown annoyed at the cryptocurrency’s staying power even though his firm is experimenting with blockchain technology—and filed a patent in late 2013 for a bitcoin-style digital payment system.

Next on the chopping block could be bitcoin miners. Bitcoin miners use tremendous amounts of computing power to verify and record transactions on the bitcoin network. In return, they receive new bitcoins which are minted at a predetermined rate. Some 80% of the world’s bitcoin mining takes place in China, the article claims the bottom could fall out of the business if miners have no way to turn their digital gains into fiat currency.

China is doing this “just to show their power,” Oleg Seydak, CEO of the marketplace lender Blackmoon Financial told AB. “They will temporarily close these companies, introduce strong regulations and keep the industry and the sector under their control.”

This approach makes sense if Chinese leaders do not want to be seen as falling behind in a new and growing market. In 2016, China accounted for the majority of global bitcoin trading activity. But with the government clamping down, China’s share has dropped to less than 15% of global volume. Japan now holds the top spot, with the  U.S. and South Korea close behind.

Sasha Ivanov, CEO of Waves, a blockchain platform believes the Chinese ICO ban is a positive development for the industry. Mr. Ivanov told AB that most ICOs were nothing but scams. He says Chinese regulators “finally lost patience, as more and more companies tried to raise millions for nothing.” China, he said, “has a reputation of being a harsh regulator that makes abrupt decisions,” but he feels confident that ICOs will be allowed by Chinese authorities once they have put in place an adequate regulatory framework.

the party's all about control“Fundamentally it all comes back to control, and right now the party’s all about control, especially around the 19th” Communist Party Congress, Bill Bishop, head of The Sinocism China Newsletter told CNBC.

Paul Triolo, practice head, geo-technology, at Eurasia Group, told CNBC, “the cyrptocurrency problem has gotten exponentially more difficult for them to get their head around and regulate.”

“Definitely bitcoin and cryptocurrencies’ free [reign] is over. But the issue of how this will affect the blockchain industry is still unknown,” Mr. Triolo said. “China doesn’t want to be left out of that. They’ll probably still end up allowing some parts of blockchain to survive. The financial piece of bitcoin and the blockchain industry is what they’re after.”

rb-

Seems to me that China wants to reign in cryptocurrencies rather than kill them off. The free-wheeling de-centralized nature of bitcoin makes the centrally controlled Chinese beureartes nervous. However they will probably adapt bitoin to meet their internal needs which is counter to the stated goals of bitcoin.

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him at LinkedInFacebook and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

Cryptocurrencies

CryptocurrenciesThe attackers behind last month’s WannaCry ransomware were planning to extort $300 in Monero cryptocurrency to unlock encrypted files. Until this crisis, who had heard of cryptocurrencies? or Monero? How could you even buy Moneros to unlock your PC, if you wanted to take that chance? More people are probably aware of Bitcoin (BTC). The Visual Capitalist explains that Bitcoin. Bitcoin is the original cryptocurrency. Its meteoric rise has made it a mainstay of conversation for investors, media, and technologists.

cryptocurrencyDespite its shady history, Bitcoin has spawned over 800 new markets and cryptocurrencies. Bitcoin is the dominant cryptocurrency, with a market cap of $37.2 billion. The rest of the cryptocurrencies are worth even more. All of the other cryptocurrencies are worth nearly $40 billion.

The leaders of the altcoin movement

Ethereum (ETH) launched in 2015, is the second-largest by market capitalization. It is also quite different from Bitcoin. The Visual Capitalist explains the difference. Bitcoin is designed to be a payments protocol first. Ethereum is designed to work as a blockchain-based computing platform. It is designed for developers to build and deploy decentralized applications, while also enabling smart contracts. The tokens used to power the network are called Ether, but they can also be traded online. At the time of writing, Ethereum’s market capitalization is $15.4 billion.

Ripple (XRP) is the native currency of the Ripple Protocol. It is a broader catch-all for an open-source, global exchange according to the Visual Capitalist. Ripple is aiming to be a settlement protocol for major banks, It’s already being used by banks such as Santander, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, UBS, and RBC. Ripple has a market cap of $10.9 billion.

Ethereum Classic (ETC) The Ethereum network actually split into two in 2016. The Visual Capitalist says it’s a complicated situation. You can read about the hack v. hack battle here. This cryptocurrency is based on the original Ethereum blockchain and has a market capitalization of $1.4 billion.

LitecoinLite coin (LTC) is one of the first altcoins. Litecoin is nearly identical to Bitcoin after being “forked” in 2011. Litecoin aims to process blocks 4x faster than Bitcoin to speed up transaction confirmation time. The improved process time creates several other challenges as well according to the Visual Capitalist. At the time of writing, Litecoin’s market capitalization is worth $1.3 billion.

Monero

Monero (XMR) is an open-source, privacy-oriented cryptocurrency launched in April 2014. It is the result of a fork of the Bytecoin cryptocurrency. CoinDesk says Monero is private by default. It has achieved the widespread adoption of those interested in using cryptocurrencies to remain anonymous. Monero has a market capitalization of $6.2 million.

Coin Market Cap monero chartThe price of Monero’s XMR has experienced significant volatility at times. It has gained more than 1,300% since it began trading on CoinMarketCap. Since its start, the cryptocurrency has fluctuated between roughly $0.25 (in January 2015) and close to $60 (in May 2017).

Monero leverages ring signatures and stealth addresses to obscure the sender’s and recipient’s identity. Ring signatures combine or ‘mix’ a user’s account keys with public keys obtained from Monero’s blockchain. This creates a ‘ring’ of possible signers, meaning outside observers cannot link a signature to a specific user.

Momero logoOriginally, ring signatures obscured the senders and recipients involved in a Monero transaction without hiding the amount transferred. However, an update called RingCT implemented a new ring signature. RingCT concealed the value of each transaction and the sender’s and recipient’s identities to make transaction tracking harder.

In addition to leveraging ring signatures, Monero also enhances anonymity through stealth addresses. Stealth addressed are randomly generated, one-time addresses created for each transaction on behalf of the recipient. With this feature, recipients publish a single address, and transactions they receive go to separate, unique addresses. As a result, Monero transactions cannot be linked to the published address of the sender or recipient.

Cryptocurrencies fungibility

By providing a high level of anonymity, Monero offers fungibility. Fungibility means that each individual unit of a currency can be substituted for another. Another way of putting this is that every coin has equal value.

Due to Monero’s untraceable nature, no two coins are distinguishable from one another. They are both equal in the eyes of merchants. Without this level of fungibility, a vendor that accepts cryptocurrency might refuse a unit of one of these assets because of its past possibly illegal transaction history.

CoinDesk points out that Monero has enjoyed a steady increase in adoption since its release. This adaption seems to be led by Dark web marketplaces like AlphaBay and Oasis which have embraced it, reportedly due to popular demand.

For those who want to purchase Monero’s, to pay a ransom, or for other reasons, they can buy them at any exchange. The Monero market operates like that of many other cryptocurrencies. Those interested in buying the cryptocurrency can get it through exchanges including Poloniex, Bitfinex, and Kraken.

Bitfinex, offers XMR/USD and XMR/BTC exchanges along with deposits and withdrawals of Monero. Kraken offers the same options as Bitfinex as well as XMR/EUR.

Other cryptocurrencies in the altcoin universe include NEM, Dash, ByteCoin, and Golem.

rb-

If the fraudsters who set off the WannaCry crisis were expecting to make a fortune in cryptocurrency, it didn’t work. Apparently, they have only made approx. BTC 50.91735344 or just under $150,000 on 320 payments worldwide. This, according to a twitter bot actual_ransom from @collinskeith which is watching the bitcoin wallets tied to the ransomware attack.

I dunno – Until somehow cryptocurrencies break their implied link to illegal activities online, they will be relegated to the black market. 

The value of cryptocurrencies are really hard to pin down. No one really knows how much they should be worth. Unlike a company, there are no assets or revenues that can be used to assess a predictable valuation. So cryptocurrencies are subject to wide swings in valuations because they operate without any tangible value behind them.

The underlying technology of blockchain seems to have a brighter future

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.

 

Visual Capialist infographic

Can Toshiba Stay in Business?

Can Toshiba Stay in Business?Updated 01/31/2024 – On 12/20/2023 Toshiba ends its 74-year history as a listed company. Toshiba’s new owner TBJH Inc., delisted the scandal ridden firm as part of the acquisition agreement (PDF). The deal structure is quite complex and involves a web of subsidiaries. Here’s an explanation from Bing:

  • TBJH Inc. is an indirect subsidiary of Japan Industrial Partners Inc. (JIP).
  • TBJH will be acquired by another JIP subsidiary, an investment fund called TB Investment Limited Partnership (TBLPS), through Brick Lane Partners.
  • TBJH Inc. acquired all of Toshiba Corporation’s shares listed on the Tokyo and Nagoya Stock Exchanges.
  • The shares of Toshiba Corporation were delisted on Dec. 20, 20232.
  • The same amount of money as tender offer price $15 Billion (4,620 JPY per share) is scheduled to be delivered in April.

This structure allowed TBJH to acquire the complete shareholding of Toshiba Corporation and take Toshiba private.

TBLPS is made up of four JIP funds, 17 Japanese businesses, and six Japanese financial institutions. The Related Fund is made up of JIP overseas cooperative funds and overseas funds including those from Japanese institutional investors.

Updated 06/22/2017 – As predicted below, the NYT reports that the Japanese government formed a coalition including the U.S. venture capital firm Bain Capital to buy Toshiba’s microchip division. Estimates are the Toshiba deal is worth approx. $20 Billion.

Toshiba is being driven to sell off its crown jewel, its microchip business, to stabilize the international giant. The New York Times reports that the stalwart of Japan’s postwar rise as a global industrial giant warned that it has doubts over whether it could stay in business. In a filing in Japan, Toshiba said it wrote off more than $6 billion connected to Westinghouse Electric’s troubled nuclear reactor projects in the United States, which had created “substantial uncertainty” over its ability to continue as a going concern.

Toshiba logoThe Toshiba microchip division is the number two global provider of NAND flash memory. NAND flash memory is a type of non-volatile storage technology that does not need power to keep data. Flash memory is electronic (solid-state) non-volatile computer storage medium that can be electrically erased and reprogrammed.

Toshiba originally invented flash memory in the early 1980s from EEPROM (electrically erasable programmable read-only memory). They introduced it to the market in 1984. Called flash memory, after the flash on a camera, the chips have become an essential building block of the modern electronics industry.

Westinghouse logoThe two main types of flash memory are named after the NAND and NOR logic gates. The individual flash memory cells have internal characteristics similar to those of the corresponding gates.

Where EPROMs had to be completely erased before being rewritten, NAND-type flash memory may be written and read in blocks (or pages) that are generally smaller than the entire device. NOR-type flash allows a single machine word (byte) to be written—an erased location—read independently.

The NAND type operates primarily in memory cards, USB flash drives, some solid-state drives, and similar products for general storage and transfer of data. NAND or NOR flash memory is also often used to store configuration data in many digital products, a task previously made possible by EEPROM or battery-powered static RAM. One key disadvantage of flash memory is that it can only endure a relatively small number of write cycles in a specific block.

Makers of flash memory chips

Samsung Electronics Co. (005930) is the biggest maker of flash memory chips, followed by Toshiba, SK Hynix, and U.S.-based Micron Technology (MU). Toshiba manufactures its NAND Flash Memories at its Yokkaichi Operations to maintain quality.

Up to 12 companies have approached Toshiba with proposalsA sale of Toshiba’s chip business, while offering the business a lifeline, would take away its most successful business — and, more broadly, would represent a shift of a major technology away from Japan, depending on the buyer. The Toshiba sale is still in its early stages, and the NYT says as many as 12 companies have approached Toshiba with proposals. Reports are that Toshiba is asking bidders to value its operations at about $17.6 billion (2 trillion yen), and make at least a 50 percent investment.

One of the better-known suitors is Hon Hai Precision Industry, also known as Foxconn. Foxconn is the assembler of Apple (AAPL) iPhones and is the world’s largest contract electronics maker. Foxconn is based in Taiwan but performs most of its manufacturing in mainland China. According to the article, Foxconn could pay billions to buy the business.

Offered $27 billionSources told Japanese public broadcaster NHK the first round of the Toshiba auction drew 10 offers. Toshiba has narrowed the field of bidders for its chip unit to four: U.S. chipmaker Broadcom (AVGO), a private equity firm Silver Lake Partners which reportedly offered $18 billion; SK Hynix; Western Digital (WDC); and Foxconn (2354), reports say Foxconn offered $27 billion.

Apple is considering teaming up with its supplier Foxconn to bid for the Toshiba semiconductor business, Japan’s NHK reported. Apple is considering investing at least several billion dollars to take a stake of more than 20 percent as part of a plan that would have Toshiba keep a partial holding so the business remains under U.S. and Japanese control, NHK reported.

Japanese government may save Toshiba

The authors point out Toshiba’s situation is a remarkable turnabout for Japan, a country that once controlled the majority of microchip markets. In the past Japanese companies have banded together to rescue flailing domestic rivals and not let them fold or be acquired by foreigners.

BankersThe article speculates that the Japanese government may cobble together a “team Japan” offer, but the response from potential participants — who would have to explain the spending to shareholders — has been tepid. “It is fundamentally unthinkable that the Industry Ministry would intervene and take some kind of action,” Hiroshige Seko, the industry minister, said at a news conference, further dampening expectations.

Mark Newman, an analyst at Sanford C. Bernstein, argued in a report that Toshiba’s memory business remained valuable enough that selling it amounted to “selling the crown jewels to pay next month’s rent.”

Apple teaming up with its supplier Foxconn to bid for ToshibaJapanese politicians and industry leaders have voiced concerns over Chinese investors’ buying advanced chip production technology; semiconductors and memory are a major priority of China’s industrial policy. That could hinder any deal with Foxconn, said Mr. Newman, of Sanford C. Bernstein.

The worry is that Foxconn “would build huge fabs in China,” Mr. Bernstein said, referring to semiconductor fabrication plants. “The jobs would move to China from Japan, and furthermore China would go after market share at the expense of crushing industry economics, so the U.S., Taiwan, Korea, Japan all get hurt substantially by this arrangement.” Foxconn has been successful in attracting subsidies from the Chinese government to build large-scale production facilities in China.

The article speculates that Foxconn could take the Toshiba technology and manufacture it more cheaply in China. Such a move could drive down pricing for memory, a boon for Apple and low-cost Chinese smartphone makers. But it would also propel China forward in its long push to become internationally competitive in semiconductors. Mr. Newman has warned that competition in NAND chips could heat up next year, creating the possibility of oversupply and putting more pressure on Toshiba’s ability to put in effect next-generation technologies.

Related articles

 

Ralph Bach has been in IT long enough to know better and has blogged from his Bach Seat about IT, careers, and anything else that catches his attention since 2005. You can follow him on LinkedInFacebook, and Twitter. Email the Bach Seat here.